我国法院调解制度完善研究

发布时间：2018-02-26 21:19

本文关键词： 法院调解理念更新模式选择制度完善　出处：《湘潭大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：任何制度都是历史的产物,法院调解制度也不例外,它脱胎于我国传统调解制度,并与新民主主义革命实践相结合,是新民主主义革命时期中国共产党的司法创新,素有“东方经验”的美誉,开创了我国解纷方式的新篇章。尤其是在转型时期利益关系、法律纠纷复杂化、多样化的背景下,单一诉讼解纷方式已经不能满足人们的需求,法院调解作为多元化解纷方式的重要形式,以更便利、简易、低廉优点,成为我国社会纠纷解决体系的重要组成部分。法院调解制度从创立之初至今数十年的实践中,历经否定之否定的坎坷,即使是到了大兴调解的今日,关于调解的争论也难以尘埃落定。足以说明法院调解制度是我国解纷体系中一个始终绕不过的话题。不可否认,法院调解制度存在一定的不足,特别是随着我国民事司法改革的深入,法院调解制度在指导理念、制度构造、实践运行中存在的问题显现,一定程度上影响了其功能的发挥,这与当前形势下法院调解被赋予的司法职能特别是政治职能相悖,引起国内学者的广泛关注。本文在历史研究、对比研究、实证分析的基础上,回顾法院调解制度的发展历程、分析制度本身存在的问题,结合转型时期的新要求,从不同层面寻求法院调解制度的完善进路,包括理念层面的更新、模式层面的构建、制度层面的具体设计。任何制度的构建和完善都是一个在历史演进、理论研究、实践探索过程中否定之否定的过程。所以,笔者没有能力也不敢奢求法院调解制度完善工作的一劳永逸。但笔者相信,法院调解制度的改革方向不在于调解与判决非此即彼的二元对立,而在于二者长期并存、相互制衡、相互渗透的实践。
[Abstract]:Any system is the product of history, and the court mediation system is no exception. It was born out of the traditional mediation system of our country and combined with the practice of the new democratic revolution. It is the judicial innovation of the Communist Party of China in the period of the new democratic revolution. The reputation of "Eastern experience" has opened a new chapter in the way of resolving disputes in our country, especially in the context of the interest relationship in the transitional period, the complexity of legal disputes, and diversification, the single litigation method of resolving disputes has been unable to meet the needs of people. As an important form of diversified dispute resolution, court mediation has become an important part of the social dispute resolution system in China with the advantages of convenience, simplicity and low cost. In the practice of the court mediation system from its inception to the present decades, it has experienced the ups and downs of negation, even though it has reached the present day of Daxing mediation. The controversy about mediation is also difficult to settle. It is enough to show that the mediation system of the court is a topic that can never be solved in China. Undeniably, there are certain deficiencies in the mediation system of the court. Especially with the deepening of civil judicial reform in our country, the problems existing in the guiding concept, system construction and practical operation of the court mediation system appear, which to some extent affect the function of the court mediation system. This is contrary to the judicial function given to the court mediation under the current situation, especially the political function, and has aroused the widespread concern of the domestic scholars. Based on the historical research, comparative study and empirical analysis, this paper reviews the development of the court mediation system. By analyzing the problems existing in the system itself and combining with the new requirements in the transitional period, we seek the way to improve the court mediation system from different levels, including the renewal of the concept level and the construction of the model level. Any system construction and perfection is a negative process in the process of historical evolution, theoretical research and practical exploration. The author does not have the ability and dare not expect the perfection of the court mediation system once and for all. However, the author believes that the direction of the reform of the court mediation system lies not in the dualistic opposition between mediation and judgment, but in the long-term coexistence and checks and balances between the two. The practice of infiltrating each other.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】