渭源县司法确认制度运行状况调查研究
发布时间:2018-02-28 19:11
本文关键词: 司法确认 人民调解 人民调解协议 渭源县 出处:《兰州大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:渭源县是司法确认制度的最初试验地,从2007年开始试点到写入人民调解法、民事诉讼法,司法确认制度在立法上不断完善和成熟,已成为我国的一项重要司法制度。但渭源县人民调解和司法确认的数据表明,司法确认制度在司法实践中的运行情况并不尽如人意,表现为制度运行以来,法院受理的民商事纠纷案件数量不降反增,办理司法确认案件给法院增加了额外的负担,面临着制度价值难以实现的困境。究其原因,既有来自制度层面的,也有来自实践层面的。制度层面的原因有:申请司法确认的调解过于苛刻,对司法确认程序的规定不明确,确认结果有可能阻碍人民调解协议获得强制执行力的机会,司法确认制度难以突破人民调解协议性质的局限性。实践层面的原因有:人民调解制度尚不健全,调确对接渠道不畅通,行政力量的不当介入等。针对上述原因,本文从完善制度设计与规范实践操作两个方面入手,提出了若干建议:首先从立法层面上弥补司法确认制度文本规定上的空缺,建议放宽申请司法确认的条件,明确司法确认的程序,对法院不予确认的建立转换程序,明晰人民调解协议的效力属性;其次在实践操作中要规范人民调解,畅通调确对接渠道,规范行政力量的介入。
[Abstract]:Weiyuan County is the initial experimental site of the judicial confirmation system, from 2007 to the trial of the people's mediation law, civil procedure law, judicial confirmation system in the legislation of continuous improvement and maturity, It has become an important judicial system in our country. However, the data of people's mediation and judicial confirmation in Weiyuan County show that the operation of judicial confirmation system in judicial practice is not satisfactory. The number of civil and commercial disputes accepted by the court has increased rather than decreased, and the handling of judicial confirmation cases has added an extra burden to the court, and it is facing a dilemma that the value of the system is difficult to realize. There are also reasons from the level of practice. The reasons of system level are: the mediation of applying for judicial confirmation is too harsh, the regulation of judicial confirmation procedure is not clear, and the confirmation result may hinder the people's mediation agreement to obtain the opportunity of compulsory execution. It is difficult for the judicial confirmation system to break through the limitations of the nature of the people's mediation agreement. The reasons in practice are: the people's mediation system is not perfect, the channels of mediation and docking are not smooth, the improper intervention of the administrative forces, and so on. This paper starts with perfecting the system design and standardizing the practical operation, and puts forward some suggestions: first, to make up for the vacancy in the text of judicial confirmation system from the legislative level, and to relax the conditions of applying for judicial confirmation. Make clear the procedure of judicial confirmation, establish the conversion procedure for the court not to confirm, clarify the validity attribute of the people's mediation agreement; secondly, standardize the people's mediation in practice, unblocked the docking channel, standardize the intervention of the administrative force.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D926
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 李勇;;浅析人民调解员队伍建设——以成都市龙泉驿区为例[J];重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版);2012年10期
2 徐永伟;;关于建立专职人民调解员制度的思考[J];中国司法;2009年06期
3 范愉;;诉前调解与法院的社会责任 从司法社会化到司法能动主义[J];法律适用;2007年11期
4 张华;赵可;;人民法院诉前调解制度的初步建构 司法ADR模式诉前调解制度合理性、可操作性探究[J];法律适用;2007年11期
5 王亚新;;诉调对接和对调解协议的司法审查[J];法律适用;2010年06期
6 江伟,廖永安;简论人民调解协议的性质与效力[J];法学杂志;2003年02期
7 张永进;;人民调解协议司法确认制度的思考——以《人民调解法》为蓝本[J];法治论坛;2010年04期
8 王亚新;;《民事诉讼法》修改与调解协议的司法审查[J];清华法学;2011年03期
9 杨雅妮;;诉外调解协议的“司法确认”程序探析——以“和谐社会”构建为背景的分析[J];青海社会科学;2010年06期
,本文编号:1548577
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1548577.html