能动司法的理论基础与实践路径

发布时间：2018-03-01 09:17

本文关键词： 能动司法司法能动主义司法规制　出处：《辽宁师范大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在西方，司法能动主义有着久远的历史，学术界对司法能动主义的研究成果也日益丰硕，但是对于我国能动司法却仍然没有一个统一的界定，现阶段，能动司法正式成为我国司法的主流话题，因而引发了学术界和实务界热烈的探讨，也出现了百家争鸣的局面。“能动司法”与西方语境中的“司法能动主义”之间，存在一定联系，部分理念也有重合，但从基本内涵与核心价值诉求等本质问题上看却有天壤之别。两者在语词使用上的关系，具有分析哲学提出的“家族相似性”特征——形似而质异——具有相似性而绝非共同性。由于我国的司法环境和宪政体制与西方国家有很大不同,故而我国的能动司法和西方的司法能动主义在历史背景、适用范围、适用方式、基本特征上都有不同，有自己独特的语境和现实基础。在我国，能动司法要求司法机关在司法过程中，综合考量政治、经济、文化等各种社会因素，灵活地创造性地适用法律，化解社会纠纷，推动社会经济、政治、文化、法律等的变革与发展，实现法的价值目标。能动司法能够在我国存在，而且受到重视与推崇的重要原因是其在体现并维护着诸如秩序、效率、正义、人权等价值的同时，在运行过程中也发挥着实现法律效果与社会效果的统一、司法权威的塑造、积累立法和司法改革的经验和缓解社会矛盾的功效。但是，司法有着被动性与中立性的特征，因此在我国必须谨慎适度能动司法，严守边界，理性实践。本文旨在揭示能动司法的理论基础,探寻其实践进路。为了能更好的探讨这个问题,本文分为四个部分：第一部分主要介绍能动司法的一般理论，对能动司法的内涵、本质属性、基本特征等做一个概括的叙述，并结合与西方司法能动主义的比较，系统的对我国能动司法的基本问题做了深入的论述。第二部分主要从法的价值入手，揭示能动司法的价值追求，充分阐述能动司法不但没有颠覆传统司法理念的基本价值，反而深化了传统司法理念的价值取向。能动司法既得到社会的普遍认同，又符合了客观上对其合理性合法性的要求。第三部分论述了能动司法规制的必要性，能动司法的盛行随之带来的一些过度司法现象为社会及司法带来了危害，必须采取相应措施予以纠正。第四部分主要寻求能动司法的限度，从司法受制原理出发，通过结合我国现阶段司法基本国情，找出一个合理的边界，通过对能动司法主体及内容的规制，防止司法权的滥用,从而使能动司法这一司法理念更好的为社会主义法制建设服务。
[Abstract]:In the West, judicial activism has a long history, and academic research on judicial activism has become increasingly fruitful, but there is still no unified definition of active justice in our country. The active judicature has become the mainstream topic of our country's judicature, which has aroused the heated discussion in the academic and practical circles, and has also appeared the situation of a hundred schools of thought contending, between "active judicature" and "judicial activism" in the western context. There is a certain connection, some ideas also overlap, but from the basic connotation and core value demands and other essential issues, there is a world of difference, the relationship between the two in the use of words, It has the characteristics of "family similarity" proposed by analytical philosophy-similar in shape but different in quality-similar but not commonality. Because of the judicial environment and constitutional system of our country are very different from those of western countries. Therefore, the active judicature in our country and the judicial activism in the west are different in historical background, scope of application, mode of application, basic characteristics, and have their own unique context and realistic foundation. In our country, the active administration of justice requires the judicial organs to synthetically consider political, economic, cultural and other social factors, apply the law flexibly and creatively, resolve social disputes, and promote social economy, politics and culture. The reform and development of law and the realization of the value goal of law. Active justice can exist in our country, and the important reason why it is valued and respected is that it embodies and maintains the values such as order, efficiency, justice, human rights and so on. In the process of operation, it also plays an important role in realizing the unification of legal effect and social effect, shaping judicial authority, accumulating experience in legislation and judicial reform and alleviating social contradictions. However, justice has the characteristics of passivity and neutrality. Therefore, in our country, we must be cautious and moderately active judicial, strictly observe the boundary, rational practice. This paper aims to reveal the theoretical basis of active justice and explore its practical approach. In order to better explore this problem, this paper is divided into four parts: the first part mainly introduces the general theory of active justice, and the connotation of active justice. The essential attribute, the basic characteristic and so on make a summary narration, and unifies with the western judicial activism comparison, has made the thorough elaboration to our country active judicature basic question. The second part mainly starts from the law value, It reveals the value pursuit of active justice, fully expounds that active justice not only does not subvert the basic value of traditional judicial idea, but also deepens the value orientation of traditional judicial idea. The third part discusses the necessity of active judicial regulation, and some excessive judicial phenomena brought by the prevalence of active judicature bring harm to the society and judicature. It is necessary to take corresponding measures to correct it. Part 4th mainly seeks for the limits of active judicature, proceeding from the principle of judicial restriction, by combining the basic conditions of our country's current judicial situation, to find out a reasonable boundary. Through the regulation of active judicial subject and content, the abuse of judicial power is prevented, so that the judicial concept of active judicature can better serve the construction of socialist legal system.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】