The Research on Presupposition, Interruption and Equal Right

发布时间：2021-09-15 16:32

　　众所周知,法庭审判在司法过程中占有重要的地位。同样,庭审会话在审判中也起着举足轻重的作用。作为法律职业者,法官、公诉人、律师在庭审中的语言技巧为研究司法公正及平等提供了重要的素材和线索。由于社会地位,教育背景,机构话语等因素的影响,法官、公诉人及律师往往较被告人和证人有较大的话语权。话语策略便是体现之一。本文从会话策略、话轮转换、话题控制等角度,既微观地分析了语言预设信息和信息焦点的错位原因,又宏观地揭示了话语权力和打断现象的深层根源。本研究共分六部分。第一章简略介绍了法律语言学的研究现状并指出目前国内研究重点;本文研究素材的采集方式,研究方法及预期目标。第二章为文献综述,主要介绍了国内外法庭话语的研究现状和话语权力研究。第三章为理论框架,作者分别从概念、分类、原因、目前研究范围等角度介绍了预设和打断理论。第四章为庭审参与者包括法官、公诉人/律师、被告及证人的会话方式与特点,为第五章对预设和打断策略的因果分析和应用奠定了基础。第五章,作为本论文的“心脏”,作者在其中深入分析了语义预设、语用预设的策略特征和打断位置、打断原因、打断后果,为庭审中被告人与证人如何反预设、反打断提供了思路和途... 

【文章来源】：中国政法大学北京市 211工程院校 教育部直属院校

【文章页数】：67 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
Chapter 1 Introduction
    1.1 An overview of forensic linguistics
    1.2 Data collection, research methods and expected objectives
        1.2.1 The collection and presentation of the data
        1.2.2 Research methods
        1.2.3 Expected objects
Chapter 2 Literature review
    2.1 An overview of courtroom discourse
        2.1.1 An overview of courtroom discourse abroad
        2.1.2 An overview of courtroom discourse in China
    2.2 Courtroom discourse and power
        2.2.1 The introduction to power
        2.2.2 Discourse power
Chapter 3 Theoretic framework
    3.1 An introduction to presupposition theory
        3.1.1 The definition of presupposition
        3.1.2 The classification of presupposition
        3.1.3 The research range of presupposition theory
    3.2 An introduction to interruption
        3.2.1 The definition of interruption
        3.2.2 The research field of interruption
        3.2.3 The places and causes of interruption
    3.3 Reasons to choose presupposition and interruption as the framework
Chapter 4 Speech manners and features in court trials
    4.1 Speech manners of the participants in court trials
        4.1.1 Questioning and answering
        4.1.2 Making statements
        4.1.3 Debating
        4.1.4 Giving directions
        4.1.5 Making declarations
    4.2 Speech features of the participants in court trials
        4.2.1 Speech features of the judge
        4.2.2 Speech features of the prosecutor/lawyer
        4.2.3 Speech features of the defendant
        4.2.4 Speech features of the witness
    4.3 Summary
Chapter 5 Realization of equal rights in courtroom discourse
    5.1 Realization of equal rights through breaking presuppositions
        5.1.1 Through breaking semantic presupposition
        5.1.2 Through breaking pragmatic presupposition
    5.2 Realization of equal rights through decreasing improper interruptions
        5.2.1 Through decreasing judge’s improper interruption
            5.2.1.1 Defendant interrupted by the judge
            5.2.1.2 Lawyers interrupted by the judge
            5.2.1.3 Witness interrupted by the judge
            5.2.1.4 Summary
        5.2.2 Through decreasing the prosecutor’s improper interruption
            5.2.2.1 Defendant interrupted by the prosecutor
            5.2.2.2 Witness interrupted by the prosecutor
            5.2.2.3 Summary
        5.2.3 Through decreasing the lawyer’s improper interruption
Chapter 6 Conclusions
    6.1 The summary
    6.2 The possible inspirations
    6.3 The imperfection and suggestions
Bibliography



本文编号：3396413