公司法上以对第三人债权出资法律问题研究
发布时间：2018-07-18 16:21
【摘要】：公司法上出资形式的探讨具有理论价值和实践意义,其中的债权出资是出资形式中理论界颇具争议的问题,以对第三人债权出资是债权出资的重要分类,也是债权出资实务中涉水较浅的领域。目前,我国现行《公司法》的规定很模糊,理论界对债权出资问题仍有争议,实践中也多为禁止,这与当今愈加宽松的国内经济环境以及逐步放宽限制的国外立法趋势显然不合。鉴于当前实务部门如火如荼地在全国范围内的开展债权出资调查研究这一现状,多种形势的催促之下,笔者将以对第三人债权出资作为单独对象加以研究,以求对今后实务登记有所借鉴,亦成为理论研究的有益补充。 本文结合了多种研究方法,其中运用较多的是比较分析法、经济分析和价值分析相结合、实证演绎的方法,力求通过对基本理论的梳理,研究以对第三人债权出资的概念、性质和可行性,分析出资风险,系统探讨该出资行为的影响与责任,进而为我国构建以对第三人债权制度设计和风险防范提出自己的看法和建议。 本文分为四章。第一章阐述以对第三人债权出资的一般法理基础,包括概念、分类和性质,分析与一般出资形式、“债转股”出资形式的区别之处。笔者还从适格性、制度兼容性和现实意义等方面系统分析出资可行性,特别是以我国现行公司法理念、公司法基本原则以及商法目的等宏观视角审视以对第三人债权出资现象,得出可行结论。这些构成了接下来论述的基础。 第二章是关于出资风险与影响的论述,分析出资风险,并从出资当事人和公司、公司债权人以及社会等多个独特角度,特别是以当前各国政府和社会各界都十分关注的公司社会责任这一特殊视角,系统分析该出资行为对公司内部和外部引发的影响与责任,作为制度设计的前期准备。 第三章,考察了国外立法实践,评判和分析英美法系、大陆法系不同制度下的做法,借鉴国外好的经验;从立法、司法、行政和社会企业等方面,谈国内立法现状与实务态度;最后进行制度的反思。 第四章是以对第三人债权出资制度的构建。笔者基于对公司实务和社会需求的尊重,一方面,正面研究出资范围、资本实收标准和出资程序等实务操作;另一方面,提出出资担保、公司内部特殊义务的构建与责任配置、出资特殊限制、评估责任分配机制、社会监控等风险防范规制的看法和建议。
[Abstract]:It is of theoretical value and practical significance to probe into the form of capital contribution in company law, in which the contribution of creditor's rights is a controversial issue in the theoretical circle of the form of capital contribution, and the contribution of creditor's rights to the third party is an important classification of the contribution of creditor's rights. It is also a shallow area in the practice of creditor's rights contribution. At present, the current provisions of the Company Law in our country are very vague, and there are still disputes among the theoretical circles on the issue of creditor's rights and contributions, and most of them are prohibited in practice. This is clearly at odds with today's increasingly relaxed domestic economic environment and the gradual relaxation of foreign legislation. In view of the current situation that the practical departments are in full swing to carry out the investigation and study of creditor's rights in the whole country, under the urge of various situations, the author will take the contribution of the third party's creditor's rights as a separate object to study. In order to practice registration in the future reference, but also become a useful supplement to theoretical research. This paper combines a variety of research methods, including comparative analysis, economic analysis and value analysis, empirical deductive method, through combing the basic theory, to study the third party creditor's rights to contribute the concept. In this paper, the author analyzes the risk of capital contribution, systematically discusses the influence and responsibility of the investment behavior, and puts forward his own views and suggestions for the construction of the third party creditor's rights system design and risk prevention in our country. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter expounds the general legal basis of the capital contribution to the third party's creditor's rights, including the concept, classification and nature, the difference between the analysis and the general form of capital contribution and the form of "debt-for-equity" contribution. The author also systematically analyzes the feasibility of capital contribution from the aspects of suitability, system compatibility and practical significance, especially from the macro angle of view, such as the concept of current company law, the basic principles of company law and the purpose of commercial law, to examine the phenomenon of creditor's rights contribution to the third party. Draw a feasible conclusion. These constitute the basis of the following discussion. The second chapter discusses the risk and influence of capital contribution, analyzes the risk of capital contribution, and from the parties and companies, corporate creditors and society, and other unique perspectives, Especially from the perspective of corporate social responsibility which is paid great attention to by governments and all walks of life, this paper systematically analyzes the influence and responsibility caused by the investment behavior on the internal and external of the company, as a preliminary preparation for the design of the system. The third chapter reviews the foreign legislative practice, judges and analyzes the practices under the different systems of Anglo-American law system and civil law system, and draws lessons from the good experience of foreign countries, and discusses the current situation and practical attitude of domestic legislation from the aspects of legislation, judicature, administration and social enterprise, etc. Finally, the system of reflection. The fourth chapter is the construction of the system of the third party's creditor's rights. Based on the respect for the practical and social needs of the company, on the one hand, the author positively studies the scope of capital contribution, the standard of capital collection and the procedure of capital contribution; on the other hand, the author puts forward the contribution guarantee, the construction and responsibility allocation of the special obligations within the company. Views and suggestions on the regulation of risk prevention, such as special limitation of capital contribution, mechanism of allocation of assessment responsibility, social supervision and so on.
【学位授予单位】：华侨大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91
[Abstract]:It is of theoretical value and practical significance to probe into the form of capital contribution in company law, in which the contribution of creditor's rights is a controversial issue in the theoretical circle of the form of capital contribution, and the contribution of creditor's rights to the third party is an important classification of the contribution of creditor's rights. It is also a shallow area in the practice of creditor's rights contribution. At present, the current provisions of the Company Law in our country are very vague, and there are still disputes among the theoretical circles on the issue of creditor's rights and contributions, and most of them are prohibited in practice. This is clearly at odds with today's increasingly relaxed domestic economic environment and the gradual relaxation of foreign legislation. In view of the current situation that the practical departments are in full swing to carry out the investigation and study of creditor's rights in the whole country, under the urge of various situations, the author will take the contribution of the third party's creditor's rights as a separate object to study. In order to practice registration in the future reference, but also become a useful supplement to theoretical research. This paper combines a variety of research methods, including comparative analysis, economic analysis and value analysis, empirical deductive method, through combing the basic theory, to study the third party creditor's rights to contribute the concept. In this paper, the author analyzes the risk of capital contribution, systematically discusses the influence and responsibility of the investment behavior, and puts forward his own views and suggestions for the construction of the third party creditor's rights system design and risk prevention in our country. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter expounds the general legal basis of the capital contribution to the third party's creditor's rights, including the concept, classification and nature, the difference between the analysis and the general form of capital contribution and the form of "debt-for-equity" contribution. The author also systematically analyzes the feasibility of capital contribution from the aspects of suitability, system compatibility and practical significance, especially from the macro angle of view, such as the concept of current company law, the basic principles of company law and the purpose of commercial law, to examine the phenomenon of creditor's rights contribution to the third party. Draw a feasible conclusion. These constitute the basis of the following discussion. The second chapter discusses the risk and influence of capital contribution, analyzes the risk of capital contribution, and from the parties and companies, corporate creditors and society, and other unique perspectives, Especially from the perspective of corporate social responsibility which is paid great attention to by governments and all walks of life, this paper systematically analyzes the influence and responsibility caused by the investment behavior on the internal and external of the company, as a preliminary preparation for the design of the system. The third chapter reviews the foreign legislative practice, judges and analyzes the practices under the different systems of Anglo-American law system and civil law system, and draws lessons from the good experience of foreign countries, and discusses the current situation and practical attitude of domestic legislation from the aspects of legislation, judicature, administration and social enterprise, etc. Finally, the system of reflection. The fourth chapter is the construction of the system of the third party's creditor's rights. Based on the respect for the practical and social needs of the company, on the one hand, the author positively studies the scope of capital contribution, the standard of capital collection and the procedure of capital contribution; on the other hand, the author puts forward the contribution guarantee, the construction and responsibility allocation of the special obligations within the company. Views and suggestions on the regulation of risk prevention, such as special limitation of capital contribution, mechanism of allocation of assessment responsibility, social supervision and so on.
【学位授予单位】：华侨大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 茹艳爽;;国际商事仲裁第三人制度研究[J];学理论;2011年21期
2 李越;李艳;;独立审计下注册会计师对第三人的民事责任研究[J];财政监督;2011年17期
3 孙文桢;;论我国未来民法典中债法的制度结构[J];重庆三峡学院学报;2011年05期
4 马立钊;;规范竞合还是规范冲突——《合同法》第51条与第150条之规范分析[J];学习与探索;2011年04期
5 杨宁宁;;无权处分和善意取得制度的冲突与协调[J];河南商业高等专科学校学报;2011年03期
6 刘家安;;“要物合同”概念之探究[J];比较法研究;2011年04期
7 杨海涌;;论动产物权变动的交付——物权法23条与合同法第133条之比较分析[J];湖南社会科学;2011年04期
8 柏欣利;;中国实证法对物权行为的立场辨析[J];广西政法管理干部学院学报;2011年04期
9 刘丽敏;魏爱江;;《中华人民共和国合同法》之无权处分考析——从传统民法角度分析[J];河北学刊;2011年04期
10 安静;;论我国《合同法》上的无权处分制度[J];青春岁月;2011年12期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 卢建辉;;雇员遭受第三人损害第三人赔偿不足部分雇主应否赔偿[A];当代法学论坛（二○○九年第2辑）[C];2009年
2 周晓娟;;唤醒“沉睡的财富”——第三人力资源开发的几点期待[A];陕西省“家庭·健康·和谐”研讨会论文摘要汇编[C];2004年
3 吕汉阳;;略论第三人权益救济制度[A];政府采购改革与国际化研讨会论文集[C];2007年
4 张丽燕;;试论第三人侵害夫妻身份权的损害赔偿——兼评我国婚姻法离婚过错赔偿制度[A];中国民商法实务论坛论文集[C];2001年
5 郭庆珠;;政府信息公开中第三人权利救济的制度进路思考——以《政府信息公开条例》第一案为引子[A];中国法学会行政法学研究会2009年年会论文集（下册）[C];2009年
6 吕尚敏;;行政许可第三人权益保护模式之重建[A];中国法学会行政法学研究会2008年年会论文集（下册）[C];2008年
7 廖宏;;论保险代位求偿权[A];甘肃保险论文集[C];2004年
8 何其荣;;权利担保与二重买卖[A];第二届贵州法学论坛文集[C];2001年
9 侯国跃;;关于合同概念与《合同法》适用对象的思考[A];第三届中国律师论坛论文集（实务卷）[C];2003年
10 董t，
本文编号：2132470
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2132470.html
