公司经理越权行为研究
发布时间:2018-07-18 17:20
【摘要】:擅长经营管理的公司经理在公司发展中的价值不容小视,已经处于公司运营的核心。在竞争激烈的市场中,公司的营利性客观上要求扩张并保障经理权力以提高效率。但是,权力趋于腐败是被实践证明了的一般规律,个人私欲驱使经理越权行事,给公司和第三人带来利益上的巨大损失。经理法律地位多元,充当了代理人、辅助公司机关等角色,享有法律和公司赋予的经理权。我国公司经理法律制度存在缺陷,主要体现在经理权制度没有得到很好体现、对经理越权行为效力判断不清晰、民事责任立法存在缺陷等。同时,我国公司发展有其特殊的背景和现状,公司内部治理也不够完善,主要体现在对公司章程作用重视不够等方面。法律制度缺陷和公司内部约束不足直接导致经理越权行为屡禁不止。这也使得适当约束经理权力,控制经理行为,成为完善《公司法》和创新公司治理模式中的重要课题。因此,结合我国具体实践,应当以完善法律制度和发挥公司自治约束作用为主导机制来约束经理行为。法律规制应当兼顾效率和安全,主要通过厘清经理权范围、加强经理对公司和第三人的民事责任及其可诉性、完善法律追究机制等措施,充分发挥法律约束机制的作用。公司则应该通过完善公司章程、合同和公司内部治理结构等途径对经理越权行为进行事前预防,通过诉讼手段和内部解决机制进行事后救济。总之,构建既能满足公司经营管理的需要,又能防止经理越权行为所产生的各种问题的制衡机制,对经理制度的合理建构和有效运作具有根本意义。
[Abstract]:The value of the manager in the development of the company is not to be underestimated, and it is already at the core of the company. In a competitive market, the company's profitability objectively requires expansion and protection of manager power to improve efficiency. However, the corruption of power is a general rule that has been proved by practice. Personal selfish desire drives managers to act in excess of their power and bring great losses to the interests of the company and the third party. The legal status of manager is diverse, acting as agent and auxiliary agency, and enjoying the legal and corporate power of manager. There are some defects in the legal system of company manager in our country, which are mainly reflected in the fact that the system of manager's right has not been well reflected, the judgment on the effectiveness of manager's overstepping action is not clear, and the legislation of civil liability has defects, etc. At the same time, the development of our company has its special background and present situation, and the internal governance of the company is not perfect, which is mainly reflected in the lack of attention to the role of the articles of association. The defects of the legal system and the inadequacies of the internal restriction of the company directly lead to the repeated prohibition of the manager's ultra vires. It also makes it an important task to restrict the manager's power and control the manager's behavior in perfecting Company Law and innovating the corporate governance model. Therefore, according to the concrete practice of our country, we should take perfecting the legal system and exerting the restraint function of the company autonomy as the leading mechanism to restrain the manager behavior. Legal regulation should take into account the efficiency and safety, mainly by clarifying the scope of the manager's right, strengthening the civil liability of the manager to the company and the third party and its actionable nature, perfecting the mechanism of legal investigation, and giving full play to the role of the legal restraint mechanism. On the other hand, the company should prevent managers from overstepping their powers by perfecting the articles of association, contracts and internal governance structure of the company, and remedy afterwards by means of litigation and internal settlement mechanism. In short, the construction can not only meet the needs of the company management, but also prevent the managers from exceeding their powers. It is of fundamental significance to the rational construction and effective operation of the manager system.
【学位授予单位】:湖南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D922.291.91
本文编号:2132610
[Abstract]:The value of the manager in the development of the company is not to be underestimated, and it is already at the core of the company. In a competitive market, the company's profitability objectively requires expansion and protection of manager power to improve efficiency. However, the corruption of power is a general rule that has been proved by practice. Personal selfish desire drives managers to act in excess of their power and bring great losses to the interests of the company and the third party. The legal status of manager is diverse, acting as agent and auxiliary agency, and enjoying the legal and corporate power of manager. There are some defects in the legal system of company manager in our country, which are mainly reflected in the fact that the system of manager's right has not been well reflected, the judgment on the effectiveness of manager's overstepping action is not clear, and the legislation of civil liability has defects, etc. At the same time, the development of our company has its special background and present situation, and the internal governance of the company is not perfect, which is mainly reflected in the lack of attention to the role of the articles of association. The defects of the legal system and the inadequacies of the internal restriction of the company directly lead to the repeated prohibition of the manager's ultra vires. It also makes it an important task to restrict the manager's power and control the manager's behavior in perfecting Company Law and innovating the corporate governance model. Therefore, according to the concrete practice of our country, we should take perfecting the legal system and exerting the restraint function of the company autonomy as the leading mechanism to restrain the manager behavior. Legal regulation should take into account the efficiency and safety, mainly by clarifying the scope of the manager's right, strengthening the civil liability of the manager to the company and the third party and its actionable nature, perfecting the mechanism of legal investigation, and giving full play to the role of the legal restraint mechanism. On the other hand, the company should prevent managers from overstepping their powers by perfecting the articles of association, contracts and internal governance structure of the company, and remedy afterwards by means of litigation and internal settlement mechanism. In short, the construction can not only meet the needs of the company management, but also prevent the managers from exceeding their powers. It is of fundamental significance to the rational construction and effective operation of the manager system.
【学位授予单位】:湖南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 刘细良;;论我国公司经理民事责任制度之完善[J];财经理论与实践;2006年04期
2 王保树,钱玉林;经理法律地位之比较研究[J];法学评论;2002年02期
3 李建华,许中缘;表见代表及其适用——兼评《合同法》第50条[J];法律科学-西北政法学院学报;2000年06期
4 樊云慧;公司经理权的性质[J];河北法学;2005年07期
5 吴清旺;代理法范式比较研究——在两大法系融合的语境下,重构代理制度的新视角[J];甘肃社会科学;2004年02期
6 程宗璋;;公司经理权的滥用和公司治理机制的重建[J];经济管理;2002年24期
7 赵万一;宋时波;;公司经理权的界定及其在我国的法律完善[J];商业经济与管理;2006年09期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 吴威;论公司法中的经理制度[D];吉林大学;2007年
2 谢梅;公司经理权法律保护研究[D];华侨大学;2006年
3 吴伟央;公司经理地位的异化及回归[D];中国政法大学;2006年
,本文编号:2132610
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2132610.html