股东转让股权引发的公司章程修改

发布时间：2018-10-21 09:50

【摘要】：公司股东转让股权引发了很多公司章程修改争议。本文将以某上市公司为例，讨论上市公司发起股东转让股权引发的公司章程修改争议问题。除最后一部分结语以外，本文分以下几个部分：第一部分为引言，列举本文所讨论案例。上市公司发起人股东转让其股权后，受让股东无法通过股东大会决议达成将其持股情况记载于公司章程的目的而要求法院强制公司修改公司章程，法院是否应当支持。该案例引出的两个问题：一个是该上市公司受让人股东的诉求如何处理，，涉及对受让人要求变更公司章程的诉求的评判，另一个是上市公司发起人转让股权后公司章程是否修改、修改程序的问题。第二部分,对受让人要求变更公司章程的诉求的评判。根据《公司法》第22条，讨论公司股东大会决议的无效与可撤销的情况，证明不同情况下本案例中股东大会决议是否有效，指明案例中原告的请求的处理方式。此外，讨论受让人要求在公司章程中记载其持股信息这一要求本身的不合理,上市公司章程不记载股东持股信息是合理性的选择。第三部分,公司章程中有关发起人持股信息记载事项的修改问题。因发起人持股信息的变更而修改公司章程的现行立法，不合理。对此，一方面可以通过对《公司法》第81条中要求记载的发起人身份进行限缩解释，将其限定为公司设立时的发起人；另一方面,可以将其归入“事实性事项的变更而引发的公司章程修改”，简化章程修改程序。
[Abstract]:The transfer of shares by the shareholders of the company has caused many disputes over the amendment of the company's articles of association. This paper takes a listed company as an example to discuss the dispute over the modification of the company's articles of association caused by the shareholder's transfer of the equity of the listed company. In addition to the last part of the conclusion, this paper is divided into the following parts: the first part is the introduction, enumerating the cases discussed in this paper. After the sponsors of the listed company transfer their equity, the transferor can not achieve the purpose of recording their shareholdings in the articles of association through the resolution of the shareholders' general meeting, and requests the court to force the company to modify the articles of association, and whether the court should support it. The case raises two questions: one is how to deal with the appeal of the transferee shareholders of the listed company, which involves the judgment of the transferee's request to change the company's articles of association. The other is whether the company's articles of association are modified and the procedures are modified after the sponsors transfer the shares. The second part is the judgment of the transferee's request to change the articles of association. According to Article 22 of the Company Law, this paper discusses the invalidity and revocability of the resolution of the shareholders' general meeting of the company, proves whether the resolution of the shareholders' general meeting in this case is valid under different circumstances, and points out the manner of handling the plaintiff's request in the case. In addition, it is unreasonable for the transferee to require the owner to record its shareholding information in the company's articles of association, and it is a reasonable choice that the listed company's articles of association do not record the shareholder's shareholding information. The third part is about the amendment of the information about the sponsors' shareholding in the articles of association. It is unreasonable to modify the current legislation of the company's articles of association because of the change of the promoters' shareholding information. In this regard, on the one hand, the identity of the initiators required in Article 81 of the Company Law can be interpreted so as to limit it to the promoters at the time of the establishment of the company; on the other hand, It can be classified as "change of articles of association caused by change of fact" and simplify the procedure of amendment of articles of association.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】