当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 公司法论文 >

公司法人格否认法律问题实证分析

发布时间:2018-11-04 17:25
【摘要】:本文在充分研究我国司法实践的基础上,对公司法人格否认制度在我国的适用进行探讨,进而提出一些建议,以期有所帮助。 正文分四个部分进行论述。第一章,主要对公司法人格否认制度的概述。公司法人格否认制度是为实现对公司债权人利益的保护而设立的,是对公司人格独立制度的补充完善,目的在于保证立法的真正公平、正义。我国目前对公司法人格否认制度的理论探讨已经颇为成熟。首先,在相关概念上基本统一,如对公司法人格否认制度的概念普遍采用朱慈蕴的提法;其次,对公司法人格否认制度的判断总结出一套标准,主要从主体、行为、结果三个方面来进行判断其是否能适用。 第二章,主要对筛选出的案例进行分析,归纳出问题,主要有以下三个方面:(一)直接以新《公司法》第20条审判起诉的案件在减少;(二)以公司法人形式规避合同义务的情形居多;(三)裁判依据多样化;(四)责任形式不统一。 第三章,对案例分析中出现的问题结合理论研究进行探讨,通过分析得出问题的原因。直接以公司法人格否认制度审判起诉的案件少是因为:首先,我国新《公司法》关于公司法人格否认制度的规定是原则性的,缺乏可操作性;其次,公司法人格否认制度适用的例外性;最后,法律中对相关行为已有明确的规定。而理论研究重点与司法实践情形不一致的主要原因是:我国公司法人格否认制度没有从我国实际国情出发,理论研究多借鉴国外判例,,且理论研究具有滞后性。 第四章,针对上述问题,结合分析结果从审判实务和理论研究两方面提出相关建议。
[Abstract]:Based on the full study of judicial practice in our country, this paper probes into the application of the system of disavowal of corporate personality in our country, and then puts forward some suggestions in order to be helpful. The text is divided into four parts. The first chapter is a summary of the denial system of corporate personality. The system of corporate personality denial is set up to protect the interests of the creditors of the company and complement and perfect the independent system of corporate personality in order to ensure the real fairness and justice of the legislation. At present, the theoretical discussion on the system of corporate personality denial in our country is quite mature. First of all, the concept of basic unity in the relevant concepts, such as corporate personality denial system generally used the concept of Zhu Ciyun; Secondly, it sums up a set of criteria for judging the denial of corporate personality, mainly from three aspects: subject, behavior and result. The second chapter mainly analyzes the selected cases and concludes the problems as follows: (1) the number of cases prosecuted directly under Article 20 of the New Company Law is decreasing; (2) the majority of cases are circumventing contractual obligations in the form of corporate legal persons; (3) the basis of adjudication is diversified; (4) the form of liability is not uniform. In the third chapter, the problems in case analysis are discussed in combination with theoretical research, and the causes of the problems are obtained. There are few cases to be prosecuted directly by the system of denial of corporate personality because: first, the provisions of the new Company Law on the system of denial of corporate personality are principled and lack of maneuverability; Secondly, the exception of the application of the corporate personality denial system; finally, there are clear provisions on relevant acts in the law. The main reasons why the focus of theoretical research and judicial practice are inconsistent are that the system of denying the personality of corporate law in our country does not proceed from the actual situation of our country, and the theoretical research draws on foreign cases, and the theoretical research is lagging behind. The fourth chapter, according to the above questions, combined with the analysis of the results from the trial practice and theoretical research two aspects of the relevant recommendations.
【学位授予单位】:河北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D922.291.91

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 潘华山;法人人格的滥用及其否认[J];法学;1998年03期

2 李继;;法人人格否认之诉涉诉主体的合理定位[J];法制与社会;2008年07期

3 宗成国;杜光坤;;试论刺穿公司面纱理论及在我国司法实践中的应用[J];工会论坛(山东省工会管理干部学院学报);2005年06期

4 李春培;;论公司法人格否认制度的社会经济效益[J];中国工商管理研究;2009年04期

5 张宗敏;;公司法人格否认中控制股东责任性质之探讨[J];河北法学;2006年01期

6 赵相昌;;公司法人人格否认的理论基础与制度构建[J];经济经纬;2007年02期

7 束景明;;试论我国公司法人人格否认制度的适用及完善[J];经济研究导刊;2011年08期

8 黄辉;;中国公司法人格否认制度实证研究[J];法学研究;2012年01期

9 向玲莉;邓晓俊;;新《公司法》如何刺破公司面纱[J];企业家天地;2007年01期

10 张晓峰;徐向艺;;公司价值最大化与企业社会责任[J];生产力研究;2007年23期

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 杨雪宗;公司清算义务人法律问题研究[D];哈尔滨工程大学;2010年



本文编号:2310617

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2310617.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户13a90***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com