股份回购的法律探析
发布时间:2018-11-04 18:35
【摘要】:股份回购的禁止及其缓和不是法律理论推演的结果,法律政策上的考量才是主要的原因。如果在政策上有容许公司回购自己股份的必要,那么,公司所要达到的目的以股份回购方法最为适当,则法律应作例外允许。同时法律必须对回购行为从决定到实施做出完善的规制,以使其可能产生的诸多弊端减至最小。这不仅需要公司法从公司内部权力制衡的角度对董事实施股份回购的方式、程序等做出规定,而且需要证券法从证券市场的宏观秩序的角度对于信息披露、防止内幕交易和操纵市场等方面做出规定。
[Abstract]:The prohibition and relaxation of share repurchase is not the result of legal theory, but the consideration of legal policy. If it is necessary to allow a company to buy back its own shares in policy, then the method of share repurchase is the most appropriate method for the company to achieve, then the law should make an exception. At the same time, the law must make perfect regulation on repurchase behavior from decision to implementation, so as to minimize the possible malpractice. This not only requires the company law to stipulate the ways and procedures of the directors to implement the share repurchase from the angle of the balance of power within the company, but also requires the securities law to disclose the information from the perspective of the macro order of the securities market. Prevent insider trading and market manipulation and other aspects of the provisions.
【作者单位】: 清华大学法学院
【分类号】:D912.29
[Abstract]:The prohibition and relaxation of share repurchase is not the result of legal theory, but the consideration of legal policy. If it is necessary to allow a company to buy back its own shares in policy, then the method of share repurchase is the most appropriate method for the company to achieve, then the law should make an exception. At the same time, the law must make perfect regulation on repurchase behavior from decision to implementation, so as to minimize the possible malpractice. This not only requires the company law to stipulate the ways and procedures of the directors to implement the share repurchase from the angle of the balance of power within the company, but also requires the securities law to disclose the information from the perspective of the macro order of the securities market. Prevent insider trading and market manipulation and other aspects of the provisions.
【作者单位】: 清华大学法学院
【分类号】:D912.29
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 徐宝华;;上市公司股份回购的利弊研究[J];安徽电气工程职业技术学院学报;2007年02期
2 郑飞,刘卫鑫;公司取得自己股份法律问题研究——《公司法》第149条之修正[J];当代法学;2003年09期
3 高汉;;股份回购及中小股东权益保护分析[J];甘肃社会科学;2007年05期
4 陈义华;;上市公司股份回购法律问题略探[J];广西政法管理干部学院学报;2006年01期
5 马晶钰,马鑫钰;股份回购事由研究[J];生产力研究;2003年06期
6 李蕾;试论企业股份回购制度的法律问题——兼议股份回购对我国国企改革的现实意义与立法完善[J];扬州大学税务学院学报;2003年01期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 刘贵祥;论债权保护在公司法制中的优先性[D];对外经济贸易大学;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 闵仕君;股份有限公司股份回购制度研究[D];苏州大学;2006年
2 蔡明;股份回购法律问题研究[D];西南政法大学;2007年
3 施一s,
本文编号:2310790
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2310790.html