论设立中公司的合同债务承担
发布时间：2018-12-29 10:13
【摘要】：设立中公司的合同债务承担,跟发起人的利益、公司的利益和债权人的利益都有着莫大的关系。这一问题在我国公司法中没有明确的规定,法院在处理相关案件时,莫衷一是,各省高级人民法院的指导意见也存在很大的分歧。《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国公司法〉若干问题的规定(三)》颁布后,一定程度起到了定纷止争的作用,然而该解释对于利益分配仍有不尽人意之处,立法根据、所采理论也尚有可探讨之处。本文旨在从立法论层面对设立中公司的合同债务承担这一问题所涉及的相关原理进行重述,并得出相应的结论。同时,比照新出的“公司法司法解释三”,分析其利弊得失。 本文拟分五个部分进行分析探讨。第一部分从案例入题,提出设立中公司目前在我国存在着性质不明、责任不清的问题。法院在裁判有关设立中公司的案件,常采用回避的方式,导致了判决中说理不足,法律逻辑混乱。目前我国的相关立法和司法都不是非常成熟,所以本文第二部分整理了与设立中公司合同债务承担相关的境内外立法与实践,分析各个规范的立法根据和价值取向,拟为下文评议我国规范提供理论基础。设立中公司的合同之债可以分为以设立中公司名义签订的和以发起人名义签订的,本文在三、四两章分章讨论了这一问题。第三章从设立中公司的界定入手,明确设立中公司的法律性质和法律地位,继而分析以设立中公司名义设立的合同的债务承担问题,第四章则是从发起人的概念、发起人与设立中公司的关系出发进行了论证。最后一个部分,归纳了本文的观点,对采用的重点理论进行了重申。?
[Abstract]:The contractual debt commitment of the established company has a great relationship with the interests of the initiator, the company and the creditors. This issue is not clearly stipulated in the company law of our country. When the court deals with the relevant cases, there is no agreement. There are also great differences in the guiding opinions of the higher people's courts in various provinces. [after the promulgation of the provisions of the Supreme people's Court on the application of the Company Law of the people's Republic of China (3) >, to a certain extent, it has played a role in settling disputes and ending disputes. However, the explanation is still unsatisfactory for the distribution of interests, legislative basis and theory can also be explored. The purpose of this paper is to restate the relevant principles involved in the issue of contractual debt commitment of the established company from the perspective of legislation, and draw the corresponding conclusions. At the same time, according to the new interpretation of Company Law, the advantages and disadvantages are analyzed. This paper is divided into five parts. In the first part, the author points out that there are some problems in the establishment of the company in our country, such as unclear nature and unclear responsibility. The court often adopts the way of recusal in adjudicating the cases concerning the establishment of the company, which leads to the lack of reasoning and the confusion of the legal logic in the judgment. At present, the relevant legislation and judicature of our country are not very mature, so the second part of this paper collates the domestic and foreign legislation and practice related to the contractual debt undertaking of the established company, and analyzes the legislative basis and value orientation of the various norms. To provide a theoretical basis for the following comments on China's norms. The contractual debts of a company under establishment can be divided into two parts: those signed in the name of the company and those signed in the name of the initiator. This paper discusses this problem in chapters three and four. The third chapter starts with the definition of the company in the establishment, and clarifies the legal nature and the legal status of the company in the establishment, and then analyzes the debt bearing problem of the contract set up in the name of the company in the establishment. The fourth chapter is the concept of the initiator. The relationship between the sponsor and the established company is demonstrated. The last part, summarized the viewpoint of this article, has carried on the reaffirmation to the adopted key theory.?
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91
本文编号：2394705
[Abstract]:The contractual debt commitment of the established company has a great relationship with the interests of the initiator, the company and the creditors. This issue is not clearly stipulated in the company law of our country. When the court deals with the relevant cases, there is no agreement. There are also great differences in the guiding opinions of the higher people's courts in various provinces. [after the promulgation of the provisions of the Supreme people's Court on the application of the Company Law of the people's Republic of China (3) >, to a certain extent, it has played a role in settling disputes and ending disputes. However, the explanation is still unsatisfactory for the distribution of interests, legislative basis and theory can also be explored. The purpose of this paper is to restate the relevant principles involved in the issue of contractual debt commitment of the established company from the perspective of legislation, and draw the corresponding conclusions. At the same time, according to the new interpretation of Company Law, the advantages and disadvantages are analyzed. This paper is divided into five parts. In the first part, the author points out that there are some problems in the establishment of the company in our country, such as unclear nature and unclear responsibility. The court often adopts the way of recusal in adjudicating the cases concerning the establishment of the company, which leads to the lack of reasoning and the confusion of the legal logic in the judgment. At present, the relevant legislation and judicature of our country are not very mature, so the second part of this paper collates the domestic and foreign legislation and practice related to the contractual debt undertaking of the established company, and analyzes the legislative basis and value orientation of the various norms. To provide a theoretical basis for the following comments on China's norms. The contractual debts of a company under establishment can be divided into two parts: those signed in the name of the company and those signed in the name of the initiator. This paper discusses this problem in chapters three and four. The third chapter starts with the definition of the company in the establishment, and clarifies the legal nature and the legal status of the company in the establishment, and then analyzes the debt bearing problem of the contract set up in the name of the company in the establishment. The fourth chapter is the concept of the initiator. The relationship between the sponsor and the established company is demonstrated. The last part, summarized the viewpoint of this article, has carried on the reaffirmation to the adopted key theory.?
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 崔建远,韩海光;债权让与的法律构成论[J];法学;2003年07期
2 刘斌斌;;论代理权滥用和表见代理——以中日民法的基础理论通过设例的分析探讨其内在关系[J];甘肃社会科学;2007年02期
3 穆昌亮;合同相对性原则刍议[J];贵州大学学报(社会科学版);2003年05期
4 梁上上;股份公司发起人的责任[J];法学研究;1997年06期
5 郑景元;;设立中公司法律问题研究[J];商事法论集;2007年01期
6 曹顺明;设立中公司法律问题研究[J];政法论坛;2001年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 文伟斌;先公司合同之债承担问题研究[D];对外经济贸易大学;2003年
2 李静;股份有限公司发起人民事责任研究[D];华中师范大学;2003年
3 王新东;募集设立股份公司发起人的法律地位及民事责任研究[D];中国政法大学;2004年
4 俞金香;公司成立前合同的责任承担问题研究[D];华侨大学;2005年
5 饶桂芳;论设立中公司及其法律责任[D];武汉大学;2004年
6 田纪华;论设立中公司的民事责任及其承担[D];中国政法大学;2006年
7 任淑贤;公司成立前合同的责任承担问题研究[D];西南政法大学;2006年
8 张纳博;发起人民事责任研究[D];西南财经大学;2008年
9 袁凤翔;设立中公司合同效力与责任问题研究[D];复旦大学;2009年
10 甘璐;设立中的公司的法律地位研究[D];天津大学;2009年
，本文编号：2394705
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2394705.html
