股东知情权制度的实证分析
发布时间：2019-01-27 12:00
【摘要】：股东知情权在股东权利体系中具有基础性的地位。对股东来说,股东知情权是股东实现其他股东权的基础和前提；对企业来说,股东知情权是公司良性运营的保障；对全社会来说,股东知情权是实现经济自我发展的动力。 随着我国《公司法》的不断完善,对股东知情权的保护也在逐渐加强。但是,面对日益复杂的社会经济活动,股东知情权领域的纠纷也日益纷繁复杂。立法者在进行法律条文设计时,更多从宏观的角度把控公司利益和股东利益,使得保护股东知情权的规定不够明确、不具有可操作性,继而影响了以知情权为前提的股东一系列权利的行使。 在新《公司法》没有修正,也没有相关司法解释出台的情况下,各级法院在处理股东知情权领域的问题时会存在分歧,甚至会出现相互矛盾的判决。经过对北大法宝若干案例的分析,笔者总结出股东知情权制度在实务中的四大问题,分别是：股东原告的主体资格问题、股东知情权的范围问题、股东查账目的正当性的问题和股东与公司举证责任的分配问题。笔者综合各个法院处理案件时所考虑的因素,并结合法理,提出自己的见解和建议。
[Abstract]:The shareholder's right to know has a basic position in the system of shareholder's right. For shareholders, the right to know is the basis and premise for shareholders to realize the rights of other shareholders; for enterprises, the right to know of shareholders is the guarantee of healthy operation of the company; for the whole society, the right to know of shareholders is the driving force to realize economic self-development. With the continuous improvement of Company Law in China, the protection of shareholders'right to know is gradually strengthened. However, in the face of increasingly complicated social and economic activities, disputes in the field of shareholders' right to know are increasingly complicated. In the design of the legal provisions, the legislators more from a macro point of view control the interests of the company and the interests of shareholders, so that the protection of shareholders' right to know is not clear enough and not operable. Then it affects the exercise of a series of shareholders' rights based on the right to know. Under the situation that the new Company Law has not been amended and there is no related judicial explanation, the courts at all levels will have different opinions and even contradictory judgments when dealing with the problems in the field of shareholders' right to know. Based on the analysis of several cases of Peking University magic weapon, the author summarizes four major problems of shareholder's right to know system in practice, namely: the subject qualification of shareholder plaintiff, the scope of shareholder's right to know. The legitimacy of stockholders' checking accounts and the distribution of burden of proof between shareholders and companies. The author synthesizes the factors that each court considers when dealing with cases, and puts forward his own opinions and suggestions combined with legal theory.
【学位授予单位】：厦门大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.291.91
本文编号：2416239
[Abstract]:The shareholder's right to know has a basic position in the system of shareholder's right. For shareholders, the right to know is the basis and premise for shareholders to realize the rights of other shareholders; for enterprises, the right to know of shareholders is the guarantee of healthy operation of the company; for the whole society, the right to know of shareholders is the driving force to realize economic self-development. With the continuous improvement of Company Law in China, the protection of shareholders'right to know is gradually strengthened. However, in the face of increasingly complicated social and economic activities, disputes in the field of shareholders' right to know are increasingly complicated. In the design of the legal provisions, the legislators more from a macro point of view control the interests of the company and the interests of shareholders, so that the protection of shareholders' right to know is not clear enough and not operable. Then it affects the exercise of a series of shareholders' rights based on the right to know. Under the situation that the new Company Law has not been amended and there is no related judicial explanation, the courts at all levels will have different opinions and even contradictory judgments when dealing with the problems in the field of shareholders' right to know. Based on the analysis of several cases of Peking University magic weapon, the author summarizes four major problems of shareholder's right to know system in practice, namely: the subject qualification of shareholder plaintiff, the scope of shareholder's right to know. The legitimacy of stockholders' checking accounts and the distribution of burden of proof between shareholders and companies. The author synthesizes the factors that each court considers when dealing with cases, and puts forward his own opinions and suggestions combined with legal theory.
【学位授予单位】：厦门大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 戚枝淬;;论有限责任公司股东账簿查阅权[J];安徽工业大学学报(社会科学版);2006年04期
2 蔡元庆;;股东知情权制度之重构[J];北方法学;2011年03期
3 庞梅;;股东知情权：从利益平衡到法律适用[J];法律适用;2007年08期
4 蒋大兴;超越股东知情权诉讼的司法困境[J];法学;2005年02期
5 甘文婷;;股东知情权制度法律问题研究[J];法制与经济(中旬刊);2010年02期
6 王燕莉;论公司股东知情权的法律保护——兼议我国《公司法》的修改[J];四川教育学院学报;2003年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 宿宝华;我国公司股东知情权实现研究[D];中国海洋大学;2012年
，本文编号：2416239
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2416239.html
