公司法规则的回应力——一个政策性的边缘理解

发布时间：2019-02-23 23:40

【摘要】：法律现实主义者十分关注法律的回应力。按照法律回应力的分析工具,最佳的公司法模式是有很强"回应性的公司法"。全球公司法的回应力模型可以区分为私人方向的回应模型和公共方向的回应模型,中国大体居于一种中间主义的状态。公司法的回应力取决于利益主体的识别、利益机制的设计以及回应成本、回应时机的考量。按照法律分工的模式,中国公司法的回应力应更集中于公司、股东以及董事、高管的利益调整,淡化其他的回应需求;要细分不同利益主体的利益层次;在回应成本和回应时机上进行改良,强化立法性、民间性、司法性回应机制,成立公司法改革检讨委员会、承认公司内部解决纠纷的能力、成立专门的公司法审判庭或者商事法院、促使裁判文书公共化。不同的公司法回应力政策会产生不同的系统性效应,导致不同的"习惯性沉淀"。要使沉淀的"法律资本"有用武之地,公司法必须持续保持其回应力。
[Abstract]:Legal realists are very concerned about the responsiveness of the law. According to the analysis tool of legal response, the best model of company law is the company law with strong responsiveness. The response force model of the global company law can be divided into the response model of the private direction and the response model of the public direction. The response power of company law depends on the identification of the stakeholders, the design of the interest mechanism, the cost of the response, and the consideration of the timing of the response. According to the mode of division of labor in law, the responding power of Chinese company law should focus on the interests of the company, shareholders, directors and executives, desalinate other response needs, and subdivide the benefit levels of different stakeholders. To improve the response cost and timing, to strengthen the legislative, folk and judicial response mechanisms, to set up a company law reform review committee, and to recognize the ability of the company to resolve disputes within the company. The establishment of a special company law court or commercial court, to promote the publicity of adjudication documents. Different policy of company law responsiveness will produce different systematic effect, and lead to different "habitual precipitation". In order to make the precipitated legal capital have the opportunity to exert its ability, the company law must keep its responsiveness.
【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;中国人民大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点项目“我国国有企业的法律调控模式研究”(10AFX013)
【分类号】：D912.29

【参考文献】