国际海洋法法庭临时措施研究

发布时间：2018-01-04 19:08

本文关键词：国际海洋法法庭临时措施研究　出处：《华东政法大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：国际海洋法法庭是基于1982年《联合国海洋法公约》所建立的专门解决有关公约解释与适用争端的机构,而其中的临时措施程序又在法庭成立后的实践中占了很大比例,对海洋争端的解决起到了很大的作用。临时措施程序的适用需要一定条件的满足,尤其是规定临时措施的初步管辖权问题以及情况紧急的认定标准成为了所有有关临时措施案件中被申请方抗辩的焦点。本文结合案例对初步管辖以及情况紧急认定的判断标准进行分析,同时针对中国在当前海洋争端不断地情况下,分析中国可以利用《联合国海洋法公约》争端解决机制尤其是法庭的临时措施程序解决争议,通过多种途径维护海洋权益。本文除了导言和结语外共分为四章。第一章是对国际海洋法法庭临时措施程序的概述,介绍了临时措施程序的一般法条规定以及该程序的价值意义,另外分析了临时措施在存在的不足,提出了本文研究的问题。第二章是对临时措施初步管辖权条件的分析,通过塞加号案、MOX工厂案详细探究了法庭在实践中对初步管辖权的认定标准,通过南方金枪鱼案分析了法庭与仲裁庭在确立管辖权上标准的不同。第三章是对临时措施程序适用时认定情况紧急的标准问题进行分析,结合案例详细分析了当事方对此标准的观点以及法庭对案件的具体认定意见,阐明了法庭对条件是否满足的判断标准。第四章则对中国利用《联合国海洋法公约》争端解决机制,尤其是国际海洋法法庭临时措施程序解决争端进行分析,首先阐释当前中国的立场态度,其次对中国利用临时措施程序维护海洋权益进行了分析。最后通过结语对全文的观点进行归纳和总结。
[Abstract]:The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea is a body established by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in 1982 to resolve disputes concerning the interpretation and application of the Convention. The procedure of interim measures has a large proportion in the practice after the establishment of the court, which plays a great role in the settlement of maritime disputes. The application of interim measures procedure needs to be satisfied with certain conditions. In particular, the question of the preliminary jurisdiction of the interim measures and the criteria for determining the urgency of the situation have become the focus of the defence of the respondent in all relevant interim measure cases. This paper combines the case with the preliminary jurisdiction and the urgent recognition of the situation. The standard of judgment was analyzed. At the same time, in view of China's current maritime disputes, it is analyzed that China can use the dispute settlement mechanism of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, especially the interim measures procedure of the Tribunal. This paper is divided into four chapters in addition to the introduction and conclusion. The first chapter is an overview of the interim measures procedure of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. This paper introduces the general provisions of the interim measures procedure and the value significance of the procedure, and analyzes the shortcomings of the interim measures. The second chapter is the analysis of the preliminary jurisdiction conditions of interim measures, through the Saiga case of MOX factory case to explore the court in practice to determine the preliminary jurisdiction of the standard. The differences between the tribunal and the arbitral tribunal in establishing jurisdictional criteria were analysed through the Southern Tuna case. Chapter III is an analysis of the criteria for determining the urgency of the situation when the interim measures procedure is applied. Combined with the case a detailed analysis of the views of the parties on this standard as well as the court's specific opinion on the case. Chapter 4th analyzes China's use of the dispute settlement mechanism of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, especially the interim measures procedure of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. Firstly, it explains China's position and attitude at present, then analyzes China's use of interim measures to safeguard maritime rights and interests. Finally, it sums up and summarizes the viewpoints of this paper through the conclusion.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D993.5

【相似文献】