“航班时刻非契约条款”辨析

发布时间：2018-01-06 23:23

本文关键词：“航班时刻非契约条款”辨析　出处：《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2014年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：航班时刻非契约条款属于国际惯例,各国航空承运人的运输总条件都有类似规定。非契约条款的效力不因航班时刻的载体类型差异而根本不同。承运人主张"合理期间"是航班时刻非契约条款合法性的直接证据,旅客则认为航班时刻非契约条款严重背离传统契约法规则,损害其合法权益。继续维持或者直接废止现有的航班时刻非契约条款都会引发灾难性后果,不利于航空运输业的整体发展。在现实条件不能满足航班完全准时离港和到港的过渡阶段,应当在保护旅客利益的前提下矫正保留航班时刻非契约条款。在航空承运人能基本左右航班离港和到港时间的终极阶段,应当明示废止航班时刻非契约条款。
[Abstract]:Non-contractual terms of flight time are international practice. The general conditions of carriage of air carriers in various countries are similar. The effect of non-contractual clauses does not vary fundamentally according to the type of carrier at the time of the flight. The carrier claims a "reasonable period". Is direct evidence of the legality of non-contractual terms at the time of the flight. Passengers believe that the non-contractual terms of flight time seriously deviate from the traditional rules of contract law, damage their legitimate rights and interests, continue to maintain or directly abolish the existing non-contractual provisions of the flight time would cause disastrous consequences. Not conducive to the overall development of the air transport industry. In the actual conditions can not meet the flight on time to leave Hong Kong and arrival in the transitional stage. On the premise of protecting the interests of passengers, the non-contractual clause of flight time should be corrected and the non-contractual clause of flight time should be expressly annulled at the ultimate stage when the air carrier can control the departure and arrival time of the flight.
【作者单位】：中国民航大学航空法律与政策研究中心;
【基金】：天津市教委社会科学重大项目(2012ZD38) 中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(SY-1450)
【分类号】：D993.4
【正文快照】： 近年来,因航班延误引发的群体事件此起彼伏,不断升级。因延误索赔、霸机、占机,甚至冲击停机坪、拦截飞机的事件频频发生。在航空旅客运输中,一般旅客都认为,航空公司没有按公布的航班时刻1飞行构成违约,然而各国航空公司却大多在其运输总条件中规定“航班时刻非契约条款”,也

【参考文献】