不干涉原则作为习惯国际法之证明方法

发布时间：2018-01-23 18:11

本文关键词： 不干涉国际法原则习惯国际法国家实践　出处：《法学家》2012年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：不干涉是公认的国际法基本原则之一,却也是在国际实践中经常遭到违反和破坏的国际法原则。原则和实践的冲突,导致在论证不干涉原则的习惯国际法性质问题上,传统的习惯法证明方法具有不完备性。国际法学界近些年来提出了习惯国际法证明的新方法。结合国际法院的司法实践,可以认为不干涉原则是具有宪政性质的习惯国际法规则,其证明方法有一定的特殊性。就定性而言,不干涉原则的习惯法性质主要是从主权平等这个国际社会的结构性原则中衍生出来的。国家实践的效果在于定量,通过考察国家实践和法律确信,来发现有关不干涉原则所支持的具体规则及其内容。在不干涉原则问题上,国家实践的认定不仅要考虑干涉行为,同时也要考虑被干涉国的反应,维护国际社会的和平与正义。
[Abstract]:No interference is one of the basic principles of international law, but also in the international practice often by the principles of international law and to break the conflict. Principles and practices, resulting in the demonstration of the principle of non-interference of customary international law on the issue of the nature of the customary law, the traditional method is not proof of completeness. In recent years the international law is proposed. A new method of international law that habits. With the judicial practice of the International Court of justice, the principle of non-interference is that rules of customary international law is constitutional in nature, the proof methods have certain particularity. Qualitative nature, not to interfere in the principle of customary law is mainly derived from the structural principle of the sovereign equality of the international community in out of the country. The practice effect is quantitative, through the study of national practices and legal certainty, to find the specific rules of the principle of non-interference and support in content. On the issue of interference principle, the determination of state practice should not only consider interference, but also consider the reaction of the interfered state and safeguard the peace and justice of the international community.

【作者单位】：芬兰赫尔辛基大学法学院;
【分类号】：D990
【正文快照】： 一、问题的提出:法律原则和国家实践在不干涉问题上的背离不干涉内政原则,又称不干涉原则,是各国公认的国际法基本原则之一。①不干涉原则包括不干涉一般原则,以及以不干涉一般原则为核心形成和发展出来的一系列具体禁止各类干涉行为的次级原则、规则和制度。1970年联合国大

【共引文献】