投资者—东道国仲裁中的审查标准研究

发布时间：2018-01-30 15:06

本文关键词： 投资者—东道国仲裁审查标准公法行为公共利益利益平衡　出处：《浙江大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：投资者—东道国仲裁在使得外国投资者的投资权益获得了独立于东道国的法律和司法机构的保护的同时,也授予了仲裁庭相当大的权力来审查东道国的公法行为,在这个过程中,仲裁庭审查标准的选择对于其判断东道国行为的合法性具有重要影响。但很多仲裁庭在选择审查标准时,因为受到商事仲裁的过度影响,未能充分意识到国际投资条约体系促进缔约国共同繁荣的目的,投资仲裁的公法属性及其在东道国和仲裁庭之间实现权力制衡的特点,以至对东道国的公法行为适用了很严格的审查标准,极大地限制了东道国对公共利益的保护。这个问题和仲裁庭存在的对类似案件的裁决缺乏一致性,在裁决中说理不够清晰等问题也导致了有关国家对于投资仲裁的信任危机。为了维护投资仲裁的稳定有效存在,我们需要从其内部解决这个问题,而对仲裁庭对审查标准进行重构是一个比较直接、有效的方式。在这个过程中,本文对和投资者—东道国仲裁一样面临平衡经济利益与非经济利益的关系的世界贸易组织,同样允许私法上的主体起诉国家的欧洲人权法院在相关案件中的审查标准进行了分析,总结了其中适合国际投资仲裁庭的经验。此外,考虑到投资者—东道国仲裁的公法属性,本文还在一定程度上对国际公法中的善意审查标准进行了分析、总结。随后,本文还分析了投资仲裁庭在审查标准上有可取之处的两个案例的经验,总结了其中可适用的经验。最后,本文在以上基础上总结了投资者—东道国仲裁中选择东道国公法行为的审查标准应考虑的因素,主要包括:投资条约文本内容的指引、条约中规定东道国义务的规范的性质、仲裁庭和东道国对争议行为的审查能力、东道国对其决策的说理、东道国决策的民主程度、东道国决策的程序等。
[Abstract]:Investor-host country arbitration, while enabling foreign investors' investment interests to be protected by legal and judicial institutions independent of the host country. The arbitral tribunal was also given considerable power to review the public law acts of the host State in the process. The selection of the arbitral tribunal review criteria has an important impact on its judgment of the legality of the conduct of the host country. However, many arbitral tribunals choose the review criteria because of the excessive influence of commercial arbitration. Not fully aware of the international investment treaty system to promote the common prosperity of States parties, the public law nature of investment arbitration and the characteristics of power balance between the host country and the arbitral tribunal. Even the application of very strict censorship criteria to the public law acts of the host State greatly limits the protection of the public interest of the host country... this issue lacks consistency with the decisions of arbitral tribunals in similar cases. In order to maintain the stable and effective existence of investment arbitration, we need to solve this problem from within. It is a direct and effective way to reconstruct the review standard of the arbitral tribunal. This paper deals with the World Trade Organization (WTO) which is faced with the balance between economic interests and non-economic interests like investor-host country arbitration. The European Court of Human Rights, which also allows the subject of private law to sue the State, has analysed the standards of review in the relevant case and summarized the experience of the tribunal suitable for international investment. Considering the public law attribute of investor-host country arbitration, this paper also analyzes and summarizes the bona fide review standard in public international law to some extent. This paper also analyzes the experience of two cases in which the investment tribunal has some merits in the review criteria, and summarizes the applicable experience. Finally. On the basis of the above, this paper summarizes the factors that should be considered in the examination standard of the choice of the public law behavior of the host country in investor-host country arbitration, mainly including: the guideline of the text of the investment treaty. The treaty stipulates the normative nature of the host country's obligations, the ability of the arbitral tribunal and the host country to examine the conduct in dispute, the reasoning of the host country to its decision-making, the degree of democracy of the host country's decision, the procedure of the host country's decision making, etc.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D997.4

【参考文献】