关于境外追赃法律适用问题的思考——以薄熙来案为切入点

发布时间：2018-02-01 01:19

本文关键词： 境外追赃没收财产薄熙来案资产分享制度　出处：《吉林大学社会科学学报》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：薄熙来使用受贿赃款购买的位于法国的别墅虽然尚未追回,但是其已经被薄熙来个人合法财产予以抵缴并上缴国库。在此前提下,该别墅就演变为薄熙来的合法财产,对其追缴和没收实质上就不再是对违法所得的没收,而是对于没收个人全部财产刑罚的执行。由于法国已经废除了没收财产刑而且对于外国没收裁决的承认与执行也只限于违法所得,所以对于该别墅的追缴将是我国面临的难题。以薄熙来案件反思我国境外追赃,主要存在以下问题:《刑法》第64条规定的各项涉案财产处理措施的关系模糊不清;没有建立承认和执行外国刑事裁决制度;薄熙来案件中没收别墅的裁决,难以通过承认和执行没收裁决制度予以执行;没收资产分享机制的缺位。对此,可以考虑从以下途径解决:明确涉案财产处理措施之间的逻辑关系;尽快建立承认和执行外国刑事裁决制度;根据案件具体情况,妥善处理违法所得的抵缴问题;建立合理务实的资产分享制度。
[Abstract]:Bo Xilai used bribes to buy the villa in France, although it has not been recovered, but it has been paid off by Bo Xilai personal legal property and handed over to the state treasury. The villa evolved into Bo Xilai's legal property, and its recovery and confiscation were no longer the confiscation of illegal income. Rather, the enforcement of penalties for the confiscation of all personal property... since France has abolished confiscation of property and the recognition and enforcement of foreign confiscation awards is limited to illegal proceeds. Therefore, the recovery of the villa will be a difficult problem for China. To reflect on the case of Bo Xilai China's foreign pursuit of stolen goods. The main problems are as follows: the relationship between the measures of dealing with property involved in article 64 of the Criminal Law is unclear; (B) the absence of a system for the recognition and enforcement of foreign criminal decisions; In the case of Bo Xilai, the award of confiscating villas is difficult to be implemented through the recognition and enforcement of the confiscation ruling system. The absence of the confiscation asset sharing mechanism can be solved by the following ways: clarifying the logical relationship between the property disposal measures involved in the case; To establish as soon as possible the system of recognition and enforcement of foreign criminal decisions; According to the specific circumstances of the case, properly handle the issue of payment of illegal proceeds; Establish a reasonable and pragmatic asset sharing system.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院;G20反腐败追逃追赃研究中心;
【基金】：司法部国家法治与法学理论研究课题(13SFB3014) 北京高等学校“青年英才计划”项目(YETP0293) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(SKZZY2014064)
【分类号】：D924.3;D920.5;D997.9
【正文快照】： 2013年9月22日,山东省济南市中级人民法院对被告人薄熙来以受贿罪、贪污罪、滥用职权罪依法判处刑罚,数罪并罚,决定执行无期徒刑,没收个人全部财产,剥夺政治权利终身。[1]薄熙来不服一审判决提出上诉,2013年10月25日,山东省高级人民法院对薄熙来受贿、贪污、滥用职权案二审公

【相似文献】