《联合国海洋法公约》中“岩礁”的演进解释与南沙群岛问题

发布时间：2018-02-23 20:30

本文关键词： 南海仲裁岩礁演进解释南沙群岛　出处：《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：南海仲裁案结果已经出炉。在实体问题裁决部分,仲裁庭一方面认为南海九段线已随着《联合国海洋法公约》的生效而归于消灭,否定我国在南海享有历史性权利的法律基础;另一方面,有悖于国际实践并曲解《联合国海洋法公约》第121条文本本身的字面含义,认定在南沙群岛中没有任何一个高潮地物属于有完全资格的岛屿。从理论层面和实践考察探究起来,岩礁的含义及其条款"维持人类居住或自身经济生活"属于类概念,因此可以随着人类科学技术和经济社会发展对其法律属性采用演进解释。为了限制当事国任意采取扩礁加固行为,应以《联合国海洋法公约》生效日作为关键日期。针对此次仲裁庭裁决既有违时际法又不符合岩礁演进解释理论,中国对其所谓实体裁决理应不予承认。
[Abstract]:The arbitration case of the South China Sea has already come out. In the part of the substantive decision, on the one hand, the arbitral tribunal holds that the nine-paragraph line of the South China Sea has been eliminated with the entry into force of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which negates the legal basis on which China enjoys historic rights in the South China. On the other hand, contrary to international practice and misinterpreting the literal meaning of the text of article 121 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Determining that none of the climax features in the Nansha Islands are fully qualified islands. From a theoretical and practical perspective, the meaning of the reef and its terms "maintenance of human habitation or of one's own economic life" belong to a category of concepts, Therefore, with the development of human science, technology and economic and social development, the interpretation of its legal attributes can be evolved. The date of entry into force of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea should be taken as the key date. In view of the fact that the award of the arbitral tribunal is both contrary to intertemporal law and inconsistent with the interpretation theory of rock reef evolution, China should not recognize its so-called substantive award.
【作者单位】：安徽财经大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目(14BFX189)“中国拥有南沙群岛主权证据问题研究”
【分类号】：D993.5

【相似文献】