论兴奋剂违规中的治疗用药豁免（TUE）规则

发布时间：2018-02-24 02:33

本文关键词： 反兴奋剂治疗用药豁免（TUE）原则 TUE国际标准　出处：《湘潭大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：2008年的奥运会上证明我国已然是一个体育大国，在兴奋剂问题上，我国向来也是严厉打击，力求割掉这颗“毒瘤”。严格责任原则使得很多案件中的运动员遭遇不合理的处罚，尤其是因服用治疗所必须的药物产生的问题。因此在严厉的背后，如何把握打击力度是现今世界反兴奋剂机制力求解决的问题。治疗用药豁免（TUE即Therapeutic Use Exemption）原则属于世界反兴奋剂机制下的五项国际标准之一。TUE的申请涉及到，当运动员因服用治疗性药物导致兴奋剂检测结果呈阳性时，是否能够免除处罚的问题。该原则的产生源于实践案例：人们意识到，只要存在违禁物质就处罚运动员是苛刻的，某些疾病的用药必然导致兴奋剂物质存于运动员体内，但并不利于运动员赛事能力。因此，，TUE规则应运而生。但是该项规则亦存在很多不可调和的矛盾和问题，笔者于是对这些问题进行探索和讨论，希望能对反兴奋剂工作作出自己的贡献。文章首先对治疗用药豁免（TUE）规则进行了概括和界定；接着通过三个案例引出了TUE规则，案例的选择依据即TUE规则的产生（首例涉及用药豁免的案件）与发展（适用规则欲推翻兴奋剂处罚成功以及失败的两个例子），使读者从实例中加深对规则的认识；再次，细分TUE规则中的具体内容，就此涉及到的主要方面展开分析，探究其理论依据和根基；最后从国际和国内两个方面总结个案对该原则的适用以及适用的结果，通过案例统计、综述等方式进行分析，将散见于各章的针对TUE实施中出现的问题作总结并提出自己的补充设想。本论文旨在通过分析和介绍反兴奋剂制度中的治疗用药豁免（TUE）原则来探讨反兴奋剂制度的完善，同时比较我国在相关制度中的规定，以求跟上世界反兴奋剂制度的步伐。
[Abstract]:In 2008, the Olympic Games proved that China is already a big sports country. On the issue of doping, our country has always been hard at cracking down on this "cancer tumor." the principle of strict liability has led to unreasonable punishment for athletes in many cases. Especially because of the problems caused by taking the drugs necessary for treatment. Therefore, how to grasp the severity of the crackdown is the problem that the world anti-doping mechanism is trying to solve. The application of the Therapeutic Use exclusion principle, one of the five international standards under the World Anti-Doping Mechanism, relates to athletes taking therapeutic drugs that result in positive stimulant testing. Whether or not punishment can be dispensed with. The principle arises from practical cases: people realize that it is harsh to punish athletes as long as there are prohibited substances, and that the use of drugs for certain diseases necessarily leads to the presence of stimulant substances in athletes. But it is not conducive to the athlete's ability to compete. Therefore, the TUE rule emerges as the times require. However, there are many irreconcilable contradictions and problems in this rule, so the author explores and discusses these problems. We hope to make our own contribution to the anti-doping work. The article firstly generalizes and defines the rule of exemption from drug use for treatment, and then leads to the rule of TUE through three cases. The selection of cases is based on the emergence of the TUE rules (the first case involving drug exemption) and development (the application of the rules to overturn the success and failure of doping penalties), which enables readers to deepen their understanding of the rules from the examples. Subdivide the specific content of TUE rules, analyze the main aspects involved, explore its theoretical basis and foundation; finally, summarize the application of the principle and its application results from the international and domestic aspects, through case statistics, This paper summarizes the problems existing in the implementation of TUE and puts forward its own supplementary ideas. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the perfection of the anti-doping system by analyzing and introducing the principle of anti-doping exemption in the anti-doping system, and to compare the relevant regulations of our country in order to keep up with the pace of the world anti-doping system.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D922.16;D997

【参考文献】