论中日钓鱼岛争端的国际司法解决

发布时间：2018-02-26 20:10

本文关键词： 钓鱼岛争端领土争端国际司法解决　出处：《西南政法大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：钓鱼岛争端是中日之间悬而未决的领土主权争端。中国一贯主张通过和平谈判协商的政治方法解决之，并针对性地提出了“搁置争议、共同开发”的政策主张。然从当下形势观之，日本对中国此重大善意举措并无积极响应，近年来仍以各种方式强化对钓鱼岛的占领，使钓鱼岛争端日趋复杂化。本文尝试探索适用国际司法解决钓鱼岛争端的可能性，并分析国际司法解决钓鱼岛争端应注意的实体法和程序法问题，以期为钓鱼岛争端解决提供另一种思路。本文共分为五部分：第一部分：主要介绍钓鱼岛争端的概况。钓鱼岛的自然资源状况是争端缘起的经济原因，而《联合国海洋法公约》关于岛屿和专属经济区的规定则是争端缘起的法律根源。对于钓鱼岛的主权归属，多年来中日双方一直坚持各自的主张并提出了相关的依据。第二部分：分析国际司法解决领土争端的优越性与局限性。国际司法解决领土争端从适用的法律、程序规则、判决的执行、争端的最终解决来看，具有一定的优越性。但同时与政治方法、国际仲裁相比，又存在一定的局限性。但总的来说，其在解决领土争端中的独特优越性不容置疑，它解决了国际上一些历经多年政治谈判仍停滞不前的争端，并推动了与领土有关的国际法的发展。第三部分：国际司法解决钓鱼岛争端的可能性分析。本部分首先运用国际法与国际关系理论分析钓鱼岛争端解决面临的困境，指出战争手段解决的不可取以及政治方法解决面临瓶颈。然后结合钓鱼岛争端的实际情况和国际司法解决领土争端的特点，分析国际司法解决钓鱼岛争端的合理性、必要性以及可行性，得出结论国际司法解决钓鱼岛争端具有一定的现实可能性。第四部分：分析国际司法解决钓鱼岛争端应关注的法律问题。通过国际司法解决钓鱼岛争端会涉及到诸多的实体法和程序法问题，这些问题会影响到国际司法解决的最终结果。在实体法上应关注有关条约法问题和有效控制原则问题；在程序法上应关注日本的先决性抗辩问题、裁判的当事人问题、证据问题中的证据的认定和举证责任规则。第五部分：分析我国日后诉诸国际司法解决钓鱼岛争端的时下作为。本部分针对前文所提及国际司法解决钓鱼岛争端所涉及到的实体法和程序法问题以及结合钓鱼岛争端的实际情况，，对我国日后通过国际司法途径解决钓鱼岛争端提出一些建议性主张。
[Abstract]:The dispute over the Diaoyu Islands is a pending territorial sovereignty dispute between China and Japan. China has always advocated a political solution through peaceful negotiations and consultation, and has specifically proposed to "shelve the dispute," From the perspective of the current situation, Japan has not responded positively to this major goodwill move by China. In recent years, it has intensified its occupation of the Diaoyu Islands in various ways. This paper attempts to explore the possibility of applying international judicial solution to the Diaoyu Islands dispute, and analyzes the substantive and procedural law problems that should be paid attention to in the international judicial settlement of the Diaoyu Islands dispute. This paper is divided into five parts:. The first part mainly introduces the general situation of the Diaoyu Islands dispute. The natural resources of the Diaoyu Islands are the economic reasons of the dispute. The provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on islands and exclusive economic zones are the legal source of the dispute. For the sovereignty of the Diaoyu Islands, China and Japan have been insisting on their own opinions and putting forward relevant bases for many years. Part II: analysis of the advantages and limitations of international judicial settlement of territorial disputes. International judicial settlement of territorial disputes from the applicable law, rules of procedure, the execution of judgments, the final settlement of disputes, Has some advantages, but at the same time compared with political methods and international arbitration, there are some limitations. But in general, its unique superiority in the settlement of territorial disputes is beyond doubt. It resolves some international disputes that have been stalled after years of political negotiations and promotes the development of international law relating to territories. The third part: the possibility analysis of international judicial settlement of Diaoyu Islands dispute. This part first uses international law and international relations theory to analyze the dilemma faced by the Diaoyu Islands dispute settlement. Pointing out that the solution of war means is not desirable and that the political method of settlement is facing the bottleneck. Then, combining the actual situation of the Diaoyu Islands dispute and the characteristics of international judicial settlement of territorial dispute, the reasonableness of international judicial settlement of Diaoyu Island dispute is analyzed. It is necessary and feasible to draw a conclusion that international judicial settlement of Diaoyu Island dispute has certain realistic possibility. Part 4th: analysis of the legal issues that should be paid attention to in the international judicial settlement of the Diaoyu Islands dispute. The international judicial settlement of the Diaoyu Islands dispute will involve many substantive and procedural issues. These issues will affect the final outcome of international judicial settlement. In substantive law, attention should be paid to issues relating to the law of treaties and the principle of effective control; in procedural law, attention should be paid to the question of Japan's priori defences, the parties to the decision, Identification of evidence and rules of burden of proof in evidence. Part 5th: the analysis of the international judicial settlement of the Diaoyu Islands dispute in the future. This part of the international judicial settlement of the Diaoyu Islands dispute referred to earlier issues of substantive law and procedural law and the combination of. The actual situation of the Diaoyu Islands dispute, Some suggestions are put forward to solve the Diaoyu Island dispute through international judicial channels in the future.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D994

【参考文献】