WTO框架下“碳关税”条款刍议

发布时间：2018-02-27 22:23

本文关键词： 碳关税单边主义 WTO规则应对　出处：《法学杂志》2010年08期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：《美国清洁能源与安全法案》第768节"国际储备配额项目"条款("碳关税"条款)引发了发展中国家的广泛反对,它的提出体现了新的国际格局中发达国家对国际多边环境公约"共同但有区别的责任"原则的不满和违反。美国在其国内环境立法过程中依然贯彻惯常的单边霸权做法,碳关税是十年来美国单边主义与WTO多边主义交锋的续演。该条款与WTO原则相违背,美国难以依据GATT1994例外条款进行有效的抗辩,WTO体制下贸易事项与非贸易价值的对接趋向亦不能为其提供先例支持。为应对此问题,我国要增强在国际舞台维护本国利益的主动性和理论依据的说服性,积极利用国际多边环境公约创设的有利平台,亦须加强对WTO体制的研究与利用,并利用此"外部动力"促进国内产业的绿色升级改造。
[Abstract]:Section 768 of the Clean Energy and Security Act of the United States "International Reserve quota Program" (the "carbon tariff" clause) has caused widespread opposition in developing countries. Its proposal reflects the dissatisfaction and violation of the principle of "common but differentiated responsibilities" of international multilateral environmental conventions by developed countries in the new international situation. The United States still carries out its usual unilateral hegemonic approach in its domestic environmental legislation. The carbon tariff is a continuation of a decade of confrontation between U.S. unilateralism and WTO multilateralism, which runs counter to the WTO principle. It is difficult for the United States to make an effective defense according to the exception clause of the GATT1994. The trend of docking between trade items and non-trade value under the WTO system can not provide precedent support for it, in order to deal with this problem, If we want to strengthen the initiative of safeguarding our national interests in the international arena and the persuasion of theoretical basis, and make active use of the favorable platform created by international multilateral environmental conventions, we must also strengthen the research and utilization of the WTO system. And the use of this "external power" to promote the green upgrading of domestic industries.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学国际法学院;
【分类号】：D996.1

【相似文献】