海运履约方法律制度研究

发布时间：2018-03-01 04:09

本文关键词： 鹿特丹规则履约方海运履约方实际承运人　出处：《大连海事大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：联合国贸易法委员会制定的《全程或部分海上国际货物运输合同公约》即《鹿特丹规则》是21世纪国际海上货物运输法发展与统一的一个伟大成果。海运履约方制度作为公约的重要组成部分,有助于解决各国对海运履约方调整的不均衡以及不统一状态,是最全面、最彻底的一次制度创新。民法履约辅助人制度是海运履约方制度的法理基础,为了适应海运实践的需要,海上货物运输中的履约辅助人制度经历了几种模式,包括“喜马拉雅条款”判例法及法律规定,实际承运人制度,美国1999年《海上货物运输法草案》中的履约承运人制度,最后建立起了《鹿特丹规则》中的海运履约方制度。本文在对《鹿特丹规则》中海运履约方制度进行详细分析后,提出构建我国海运履约方制度的策略。但我国港口经营人的责任限制问题是无法在短时间内解决的,本文旨在对我国港口经营人作为承运人的履约辅助人的责任限制问题提出建议和意见。本文共分为五个部分。第一部分,从历史上纵向考察了海运履约方制度的沿革,概括介绍了民法履约辅助人制度,海上货物运输中的履约辅助人制度,进而引出海运履约方制度的建立。第二部分,解读公约中海运履约方的概念,并将其与其他相关概念进行比较分析,得出海运履约方的特征和类型,以便将海运履约方从履约方中识别出来。第三部分,详细论述公约下海运履约方的权利、义务和责任。第四部分,评价海运履约方制度。第五部分,在以上分析的基础上,分析公约对我国海运服务业的影响,指出我国相关制度与海运履约方制度的差别及构建我国海运履约方制度的障碍,进而提出构建我国海运履约方制度的策略。
[Abstract]:The United Nations Commission on Trade Law Convention on contracts for the International Carriage of goods wholly or partly by Sea, the Rotterdam rules, was a great achievement in the development and unification of the law of the international carriage of goods by sea in 21th century. Maritime performing parties. As an important part of the Convention, It is the most comprehensive and thorough institutional innovation that helps to solve the imbalance and disunity of the adjustment of maritime performing parties in various countries. The civil law system of performance auxiliaries is the legal basis of maritime performing party system. In order to meet the needs of maritime transport practice, the system of performance auxiliaries in the carriage of goods by sea has undergone several models, including the case law of the Himalayan Clause and the legal provisions of the actual carrier system, The system of performing carrier in the draft of the draft Law on the Carriage of goods by Sea in the United States of America in 1999, and finally the system of maritime performing party in the Rotterdam rules has been established. After a detailed analysis of the system of maritime performing parties in the Rotterdam rules, this paper makes a detailed analysis of the system of maritime performing parties in the Rotterdam rules. This paper puts forward the strategy of constructing the system of maritime performing party in our country. However, the limitation of the liability of the port operator in our country cannot be solved in a short time. The purpose of this paper is to put forward suggestions and suggestions on the limitation of the liability of the port operator as the carrier's helper of performance. This paper is divided into five parts. The first part, from the history of longitudinal investigation of the maritime performing party system evolution, a general introduction of the civil law performance assistive system, the maritime cargo transport system, and then lead to the establishment of maritime performing party system. The interpretation of the concept of maritime performing party in the Convention and its comparative analysis with other relevant concepts in order to obtain the characteristics and types of maritime performing party in order to identify the maritime performing party from the performing party... part III, The rights, obligations and responsibilities of maritime performing parties under the Convention are discussed in detail. Part 4th, the evaluation of maritime performing party system. 5th, on the basis of the above analysis, the impact of the Convention on China's maritime transport service industry is analyzed. This paper points out the differences between the relevant systems of our country and the maritime performing party system and the obstacles to the construction of the maritime performing party system of our country, and then puts forward the strategy of constructing the maritime performing party system of our country.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996

【参考文献】