“布鲁塞尔体系”下协议管辖制度研究

发布时间：2018-03-02 23:22

本文选题：协议管辖　切入点：管辖协议　出处：《辽宁大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：国际私法中的协议管辖制度,是国际民事诉讼中调和管辖冲突,确定诉讼管辖权的重要内容之一。协议管辖是国际私法上的当事人意思自治原则在国际民商事诉讼管辖权问题上的自然延伸和具体体现,是确定管辖权归属的重要制度之一。国际私法中的协议管辖已经成为现代国际社会中普遍接受的一项管辖原则,为世界上绝大多数国家接受和采纳。目前世界上关于协议管辖的国际公约,受到广泛好评的莫过于欧洲联盟的《布鲁塞尔公约》和《卢加诺公约》,它们以详实的规定和广泛的效力在协议管辖领域立法当中处于遥遥领先的地位,在解决协议管辖问题上也成为诸多国家向往和参照的对象。布鲁塞尔公约、卢加诺公约和布鲁塞尔条例等欧盟通过的一系列公约、条例和指令共同构成了布鲁塞尔体系。布鲁塞尔体系下协议管辖制度的立法内容,为其他国家和地区提供了先进的立法模式。协议管辖制度也随着布鲁塞尔体系的形成而不断发展完善。本文在分析借鉴欧盟解决成员国间管辖权冲突方面的经验教训,可为我国解决类似问题提供十分有益的参考。并结合我国的实际情况,提出一些建议,希望可以完善我国的涉外协议管辖制度。从以上角度出发,全文主要分四部分进行阐述:首先,从协议管辖制度的产生入手,分析协议管辖制度的概念和理论基础,及协议管辖的效力所包含的内容。这些是协议管辖制度的基础;其次,分析布鲁塞尔体系的形成过程,介绍布鲁塞尔体系中协议管辖制度的具体内容,以及该制度在欧盟成员国的实施;第三,通过世界其他国家和地区的实践,分析该制度对其他公约的影响,探讨该制度的最新发展;最后,阐述布鲁塞尔体系对我国的借鉴意义并分析我国协议管辖制度的立法现状,指出缺陷,提出完善修改的建议。
[Abstract]:The system of jurisdiction by agreement in private international law is to reconcile the conflict of jurisdiction in international civil proceedings. Agreement jurisdiction is the natural extension and concrete embodiment of the principle of party autonomy in private international law in international civil and commercial litigation jurisdiction. Agreement jurisdiction in private international law has become a universally accepted principle of jurisdiction in the modern international community, Accepted and adopted by the vast majority of countries in the world... the current international conventions on the jurisdiction of agreements in the world, Nothing more well received than the Brussels Convention and the Lugano Convention of the European Union, which, with their detailed provisions and extensive force, are well placed in the forefront of legislation in the area of agreement jurisdiction, It has also become the object of yearning and reference by many countries in resolving the issue of agreement jurisdiction. The Brussels Convention, the Lugano Convention and the Brussels regulations have been adopted by the European Union in a series of conventions. The regulations and directives together form the Brussels system. The legislative content of the agreed jurisdiction system under the Brussels system, It has provided advanced legislative model for other countries and regions. The system of agreement jurisdiction has also been developed and perfected with the formation of Brussels system. This paper analyzes and draws lessons from the EU's experience in resolving conflicts of jurisdiction among member states. It can provide a very useful reference for our country to solve similar problems. Combined with the actual situation of our country, this paper puts forward some suggestions, hoping to perfect our country's foreign agreement jurisdiction system. From the above point of view, the full text is mainly divided into four parts: first, starting with the emergence of the agreement jurisdiction system, the concept and theoretical basis of the agreement jurisdiction system are analyzed. These are the basis of the agreement jurisdiction system. Secondly, the formation process of the Brussels system is analyzed, and the specific content of the agreement jurisdiction system in the Brussels system is introduced. And the implementation of the system in EU member States; third, through the practice of other countries and regions in the world, to analyze the impact of the system on other conventions, to explore the latest development of the system; finally, This paper expounds the reference significance of Brussels system to our country, analyzes on the present legislative situation of our country's agreement jurisdiction system, points out the defects, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect and amend it.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D997

【参考文献】