岛礁法律地位的解释问题研究——以“南海仲裁案”的实体裁决为中心

发布时间：2018-03-04 01:29

本文选题：南海仲裁案　切入点：《联合国海洋法公约》第条　出处：《法商研究》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：相关国家对《联合国海洋法公约》第121条解释实践的不统一和国际司法、仲裁机构对该条解释问题的回避态度充分说明这一问题的敏感性和复杂性。在"南海仲裁案"裁决书第六部分C项中,仲裁庭无视其对相关岛礁法律地位判定问题并无管辖权的事实,对《联合国海洋法公约》第121条进行了细致而又复杂的解释,支持了菲律宾的相关仲裁请求,无视中国在南海的权益。对我国而言,当务之急是批驳仲裁庭在解释《联合国海洋法公约》第121条时存在的悖论,为我国"不接受、不承认"仲裁裁决提供依据,而不是急于澄清第121条的"真实含义"或"正确解释方法"。鉴于此,我国对《联合国海洋法公约》第121条的解释应当审慎地逐步推进,利用联合国秘书处海洋事务和海洋法司主持的专家会发声,争取规则修订的话语权,并在区域、双边和单边层面采取相应的应对措施。
[Abstract]:Inconsistency in the practice of interpretation of article 121 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and international justice by the States concerned, The aversion of the arbitral institution to the interpretation of the article fully illustrates the sensitivity and complexity of the issue. In part C of the award 6th of the South China Sea Arbitration case, Ignoring the fact that it had no jurisdiction over the determination of the legal status of the relevant islands and reefs, the arbitral tribunal interpreted article 121 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in detail and complicated, and supported the relevant Philippine request for arbitration, Ignoring China's rights and interests in the South China Sea. For China, the urgent task is to refute the paradox existing in the interpretation of Article 121 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea by the arbitral tribunal, so as to provide a basis for our country's "non-acceptance and non-recognition" of the arbitral award. Rather than rushing to clarify the "true meaning" or "correct interpretation" of article 121... in view of this, our interpretation of article 121 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea should be carefully and progressively advanced, To use the voice of experts under the auspices of the Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea of the United Nations Secretariat to seek a voice in the revision of the rules and to respond accordingly at the regional, bilateral and unilateral levels.
【作者单位】：吉林大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(16JJD820010) 中国法学会部级法学研究课题[CLS(2016)D161]
【分类号】：D993.5

【相似文献】