中美轮胎特保案“市场扰乱”的认定标准分析

发布时间：2018-03-08 11:21

本文选题：市场扰乱　切入点：迅速增加　出处：《华东政法大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：中美轮胎特保案，，是针对中国入世议定书第16条项下所规定的特殊保障措施的第一起案件，虽然关于特殊保障措施的理论研究已经有很多前辈多有论述，但是针对这第一起发生的实际案件，针对有些条文的规定在具体争议解决中的解释问题，笔者认为还是非常有必要来分析一下专家组以及上诉机构的意见，这样才能够更好的指导我们今后在争议解决中如何把握专家组以及上诉机构针对某些条文的解释倾向，更好地在现有条文规定的情况下最大限度的保护自己的合法权益。本文主要是以上诉机构的报告为出发点，文章重心是分析在上诉机构报告中是如何具体认定“市场扰乱”的认定标准的，而不是从纯理论的角度去分析“市场扰乱”的认定标准，而且本文的论述重点主要局限于针对存在“市场扰乱”启动特殊保障措施适用时的“市场扰乱”的认定标准，而对重大贸易转移所启动的特殊保障措施的适用不作讨论。本文除去引言和结语，全文共分五章。第一章介绍特殊保障措施的概念以及特殊保障措施与一般保障措施及GATT1994第19条之间的关系。第二章介绍了市场扰乱这一概念的产生和发展，通过论述我们可以发现不论该概念以何种形式出现，其本质还是为了保护本国的国内产业，这也为我们更好的理解特殊保障措施的提出，提供了一个大的背景。第三章论述了针对议定书第16条的解释问题，介绍了在实际案件中，专家组及上诉机构是如何确定某一条文的具体内涵的。第四章从上诉机构的报告中总结概括出，在实际案件中市场扰乱的认定标准是如何的，结合中美轮胎特保案的实际案情，分别总结概括出了，进口迅速增加的认定，因果关系的认定。而在针对因果关系的认定中又确立了，什么是重要原因的认定，进口迅速增加与实质损害之间的联系的认定。第五章是通过实际分析专家组以及上诉机构的报告，我们能够发现专家组以及上诉机构在实际案件中是倾向于如何具体解释抽象的条文的，为我们今后更好的应诉，更好的利用现有的条文，最大限度的保护自己的合法权益提供了一些实际的指导意见。
[Abstract]:The China-US tire special protection case is the first case against the special safeguard measures stipulated under Article 16 of the Protocol on China's accession to the WTO, although the theoretical study on special safeguard measures has already been discussed by many previous generations. However, in view of this first actual case and the interpretation of some provisions in the specific dispute settlement, the author thinks that it is still very necessary to analyze the opinions of the Panel of experts and the Appellate body. Only in this way can we better guide us in how to grasp the interpretation tendency of the Panel of experts and the appellate bodies on certain articles in the future in dispute settlement. Better to protect their legitimate rights and interests to the maximum extent under the existing provisions. This article is mainly based on the report of the Appellate body as the starting point. The focus of the article is to analyze how to identify the criterion of "market disturbance" in the report of appellate body, but not to analyze the criterion of "market disturbance" from the point of view of pure theory. Moreover, the emphasis of this paper is mainly limited to the identification standard of "market disturbance" when the special safeguard measures are applicable. However, the application of special safeguard measures initiated by major trade transfer is not discussed. Apart from the introduction and conclusion, the full text is divided into five chapters. The first chapter introduces the concept of special safeguard measures and the relationship between special safeguard measures and general safeguard measures and article 19 of GATT1994. The second chapter introduces the emergence and development of the concept of market disruption. By discussing the concept, we can find that the essence of the concept, no matter what form it takes, is to protect the domestic industry of the country. This also provides a big background for us to better understand the proposal of special safeguard measures. The third chapter discusses the interpretation of Article 16 of the Protocol and introduces how the Panel of experts and the Appellate body determine the specific connotation of a certain article in practical cases. Chapter 4th summarizes from the report of the Appellate body, what is the standard for determining market disruption in actual cases? combined with the actual circumstances of the China-US tire special protection case, it sums up separately the determination that imports are increasing rapidly. In the identification of causality, the identification of what is the important cause, the relationship between the rapid increase of imports and the substantial damage. Chapter 5th is based on a practical analysis of the reports of expert groups and appellate bodies, and we can see how the panels and appellate bodies tend to interpret abstract provisions in actual cases, so that we can better respond to complaints in the future. Better use of existing provisions, maximum protection of their legitimate rights and interests to provide some practical guidance.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.1

【参考文献】