论国际刑事诉讼移转管辖制度

发布时间：2018-03-14 16:45

本文选题：刑事诉讼移转管辖　切入点：国际司法协助　出处：《华东政法大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在国际刑事司法协助形式中，刑事诉讼移转管辖是一种新型的制度。但从产生到现在,该制度特有的理论及实践价值已经逐渐展现出来。国际社会目前对于这一制度基本认可，并在《欧洲刑事诉讼移转管辖公约》、《联合国刑事诉讼移转管辖示范公约》专门性规定以及其他多边公约、双边条约中采纳了该制度。但是作为一种新型的司法协助形式，该制度至今在世界范围内尚未形成一个完整体系，在实践中也存在着许多的问题。本文拟从该制度的功效和实践意义角度，探讨在适用该制度方面国际社会已经取得的成就和发展中存在的问题。中国是一个发展中国家，法制建设逐步形成完整体系。但是，在国际刑事诉讼移转管辖合作方面，中国与国际法制接轨的还有一段很大的距离。与此同时，中国需要借助国际刑事诉讼移转管辖制度的案件却大幅增长。据由国务院侨办与华侨大学、社会科学文献出版社联合2011年8月15日发布的《华侨华人研究报告（2011）》，1大陆改革开放30年至今，中国移民海外人数逾450万，移民人数稳居世界第一；而另一份招商银行与贝恩顾问公司发布的《2011中国私人财富报告》的调研显示，个人资产超过1亿元的大陆企业主中，27%已经移民，47%正在考虑移民。这些移民海外的企业主中不乏涉嫌抽逃出资、集资诈骗等经济类犯罪的人，他们的犯罪行为一般分为办理移民—资产转移—择机出逃三步，当下温州老板集体外逃有利地证明了这一点。由于案发时嫌疑人已是外国国籍，在“本国民不引渡”这一公认的国际法原则下，，引渡之路已经行不通，这更凸显了刑事诉讼移转管辖制度的必要性。笔者认为中国有迫切的必要本着信守国际条约的原则，借鉴其他法域地区和国家的立法经验，尽快从我国国情出发对刑事诉讼移转管辖制度进行相关立法与研究。
[Abstract]:In the form of international criminal judicial assistance, transfer of criminal proceedings to jurisdiction is a new type of system, but from its emergence to now, the unique theoretical and practical value of this system has been gradually displayed. And in the European Convention on transfer of jurisdiction in Criminal Proceedings, the specialized provisions of the United Nations Model Convention on transfer of jurisdiction in Criminal Proceedings and other multilateral conventions, which have been adopted in bilateral treaties, but as a new form of mutual legal assistance, The system has not yet formed a complete system in the world, and there are many problems in practice. To explore the achievements and problems of the international community in the application of the system. China is a developing country, and its legal system is gradually forming a complete system.However, in terms of international cooperation in transferring criminal proceedings to jurisdiction, China still has a long way to go in line with the international legal system. At the same time, The number of cases in China that need to transfer jurisdiction through international criminal proceedings has increased dramatically. According to the Office of overseas Chinese Affairs of the State Council and the overseas Chinese University, Since the reform and opening up in mainland China 30 years ago, the number of Chinese emigrants overseas has exceeded 4.5 million, ranking the first in the world. Another survey of China Private Wealth 2011 by China Merchants Bank and Bain Consultants shows that. Twenty-seven percent of mainland business owners with personal assets of more than 100 million yuan have emigrated, or 47 percent are considering emigration. Many of these overseas business owners are suspected of withdrawing capital contributions and raising funds for fraud and other economic crimes. Their criminal acts are generally divided into three steps: handling immigration, transferring assets and escaping by chance. The collective flight of Wenzhou bosses at the moment proves this advantageously. Since the suspect was already a foreign nationality at the time of the crime, Under the universally recognized principle of international law that "this national does not extradite", the path of extradition has become unworkable, which highlights the necessity of transferring criminal proceedings to jurisdiction. The author believes that China has an urgent need to abide by the principle of international treaties. Based on the legislative experience of other jurisdictions and countries, this paper makes a study on the transfer of criminal proceedings to jurisdiction system from the point of view of our country's national conditions as soon as possible.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D997.9

【相似文献】