337调查管辖范围的最新发展及我国应对措施

发布时间：2018-03-17 04:31

本文选题：调查　切入点：引诱侵权　出处：《国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报)》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：Suprema Inc.v.ITC以及Clear Correct Operating LLC v.ITC昭示了美国337调查的最新发展。前者确认了美国国际贸易委员会对引诱侵权行为享有管辖权,而后者则否认了数据资料为337调查的对象。两起案件的关键均在于对关税法337条款的解释,这两起案件对我国企业进军美国市场产生了重要影响。为了有效应对337调查管辖范围的最新发展,一方面,在国际谈判中,我国政府应当对ITC扩大行政职权与WTO贸易规则方面的冲突作出回应,并着力构建"中国版的337调查"制度,以保证国内产业安全;另一方面,我国企业应当加强知识产权管理,通过完善知识产权预警机制、专利布局等避免遭受337调查。
[Abstract]:Suprema Inc.v.ITC and Clear Correct Operating LLC v.ITC have highlighted the latest developments in the U. S. investigation. The former confirmed the jurisdiction of the US International Trade Commission over seduction violations, The latter denied that the data was the subject of the 337 investigation. The key to both cases was the interpretation of Section 337 of the Customs Act. These two cases have had an important impact on the entry of Chinese enterprises into the United States market. In order to effectively respond to the latest developments in the jurisdiction of the 337 investigation, on the one hand, in international negotiations, Our government should respond to the conflict between the expansion of the administrative authority of ITC and the trade rules of WTO, and make great efforts to construct the "Chinese version of 337 investigation" system to ensure the safety of domestic industries, on the other hand, our enterprises should strengthen the management of intellectual property rights. Through the improvement of intellectual property warning mechanism, patent layout and so on to avoid 337 investigation.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“中国高铁产业发展中的知识产权对策研究”(11BFX044)
【分类号】：D996.3

【相似文献】