审前阶段媒体介入司法程序的效果与规制——欧洲经验及其启示

发布时间：2018-03-30 00:13

  本文选题：媒体　切入点：司法程序　出处：《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年05期

【摘要】：自大众传媒产生之日起,关于法律案件的新闻报道便受到了种种竞争性法律价值的限制。拥有引导舆论功能的新闻媒体在诉讼程序的审前、庭审以及审后阶段的报道,对司法程序及相关利益产生了不同程度的影响。就某种意义而言,新闻媒体与诉讼程序俨然成为矛盾的对立双方。尽管这一矛盾无法避免,但通过界定和判断新闻自由与竞争性利益之间的关系,我们可以进行新的关系调整以减小矛盾影响,欧洲人权法院在削弱两者矛盾方面作出了许多探索和贡献。文章试图借鉴欧洲经验,分析审前阶段媒体介入司法程序的效果与规制,以确立媒体与司法程序之间的合理关系。
[Abstract]:Since the emergence of the mass media, news reports on legal cases have been restricted by various competitive legal values. The news media, which have the function of guiding public opinion, report in the pretrial, trial and post-trial stages of the proceedings. Has had varying degrees of influence on the judicial process and related interests. In a sense, the news media and the proceedings have become opposing parties to the conflict, although this contradiction cannot be avoided. But by defining and judging the relationship between freedom of the press and competitive interests, we can make new adjustments to reduce the impact of conflicts. The European Court of Human Rights has made many explorations and contributions in weakening the contradiction between the two. This paper attempts to draw lessons from European experience and analyze the effect and regulation of media intervention in judicial proceedings in the pre-trial stage in order to establish a reasonable relationship between the media and the judicial procedure.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学党委宣传部;
【分类号】：D998.2
，

本文编号：1683498