我国应对PSPC新规的法律问题与对策

发布时间：2018-04-04 20:26

本文选题：PSPC　切入点：不可预见　出处：《上海交通大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：国际海事组织（IMO）的海上安全委员会（MSC）于2006年12月8日通过PSPC文件，即所有类型船舶专用海水压载舱和散货船双舷侧处所保护涂层性能标准，并使之成为国际公约框架内的强制性标准。PSPC规则将于2012年7月1日起开始强制执行，在此生效日期已迫在眉睫之际，中国的船厂会遇到哪些法律问题，以及做好哪些准备呢？为此，，本文首先分析了PSPC的法律含义，特别是IMO1247号通函规定的法律程序，以及在适用该通函时可能会遇到的法律冲突。通过对英国法和中国法的比较，对通函中“不可预见”的情形进行了具体分析。在船东尾款不足的情况下，船厂通常采取的几种救济手段和可能遇到的法律问题也是本文的研究重点之一。最后本文探讨了船厂在采取自行登记船舶这一救济措施时可以采取的两种应对方式。
[Abstract]:The Maritime Safety Committee (MSC) of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) adopted the PSPC document on 8 December 2006, the performance Standard for Protective Coatings for all types of ships dedicated to seawater Ballast tanks and bulk carriers,And make it a mandatory standard within the framework of international conventions. PSPC rules will be enforced on July 1, 2012. When the effective date is imminent, what legal problems will Chinese shipyards encounter and what preparations will be made?For this reason, this paper first analyzes the legal meaning of PSPC, especially the legal procedure stipulated by circular IMO1247, and the conflicts of laws that may be encountered when applying the circular.By comparing the English law with the Chinese law, this paper makes a concrete analysis of the "unforeseen" situation in the circular letter.In the case of shortage of shipowner's tail money, several remedies and possible legal problems that shipyards usually take are also one of the key points of this paper.Finally, this paper discusses two kinds of countermeasures that shipyards can take when they take the relief measures of self-registration of ships.
【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996

【参考文献】