ICSID仲裁裁决的“四代”撤销标准研究

发布时间：2018-04-14 19:13

本文选题：ICSID仲裁裁决 + 撤销标准　；参考：《西南政法大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：ICSID仲裁撤销制度是ICSID仲裁制度中维护仲裁裁决公正的唯一制度。在此制度中专门委员会依据《华盛顿公约》第52条规定的内容对案件进行审查，然后其决定是否撤销仲裁裁决。由于第52条规定的撤销事由过于简单，专门委员会在对案件审查时就必须解释撤销事由。然而每个专门委员会可能采取不同的方法解释撤销事由，所以造成每个案件的撤销标准不同。从第一件撤销案件到2010年夏天的撤销案件看来，我们可以将撤销标准划分为四个阶段，每个阶段都呈现出不同的特点。文章从宏观上把握每一代撤销标准的大致趋向，再从微观上观察同一撤销事由每代撤销标准之间的差异，以更好地了解四代撤销标准的变化趋势。文章通过对撤销标准的研究，以促进ICSID仲裁制度的发展，保障当事人的利益。本文共分引言、正文、结束语三大部分，其中正文分为四个部分。文章通过对ICSID仲裁裁决的四代撤销标准的研究，从宏观及微观的视角对每一代的撤销标准进行了论述，分析每代之间的变化趋势及对ICSID仲裁制度的影响。第一部分概述了ICSID仲裁裁决撤销标准发展的四代。首先从宏观上把握每一代撤销标准的特点。然后简单地介绍了每一代的代表撤销案件及每一代撤销标准的整体特点，使读者对于案件的撤销情况及标准的特点有大致了解。其次对于四代撤销标准的划分进行了思考，对此划分标准进行了阐述并提出自己的见解。第二部分从“仲裁庭明显越权”角度出发，对四代撤销标准进行了论述。专门委员会是以仲裁庭“适用准据法缺陷”的问题来判断仲裁庭是否越权，，此部分得出了每一代的此项撤销标准。通过分析这些撤销标准在实践中的运用，发现专门委员会的审查范围逐渐扩大，撤销标准开始降低。这一变化趋势促使设立ICSID上诉机构的呼声高涨，同时也呼吁双方当事人在签订双边条约时，完善准据法的适用条款。第三部分是以“严重违背基本程序规则”的视角来论述四代撤销标准。专门委员会在判断仲裁庭是否“严重违背基本程序规则”时，主要是从“侵犯当事人申辩权”、“违反证据规则”、“违反公平待遇原则”三方面进行判断。本部分结合代表案件进行分析，得到了每一代的此项撤销标准。当事人的申辩权逐渐引起人们重视，专门委员会对于“严重违背基本程序规则”的解释也逐渐清晰。这些变化不仅要求ICSID仲裁制度充分保护当事人的权利，还要求仲裁员不断提高其自身的素质。第四部分从“裁决未陈述其所依据理由”方面，对四代撤销标准进行了论述。专门委员会是以仲裁庭在裁决中“未陈述理由”和“理由矛盾”来判断仲裁庭是否构成此项撤销事由。本部分通过对代表案件的分析，发现每一代的此项撤销标准逐渐变得宽，但仍然缺乏统一的标准。这一变化要求在ICSID仲裁制度中建立遵循先例制度，仲裁庭可以参照先例仲裁案件，不仅可防止案件被撤销，还可提高仲裁的效率。
[Abstract]:ICSID is the only system of arbitration revocation system maintenance arbitration justice ICSID arbitration system. In this system, the Special Committee on the basis of "Washington Convention > fifty-second of the provisions of the review of the case, and then decide whether the revocation of an arbitral award. Due to the provisions of article fifty-second of the revocation of the subject is too simple, the Special Committee on review of the case must be explain the cause for cancellation. However, each special committee may adopt different methods to explain the cause for cancellation, resulting in each case the revocation of different standards. The first piece to dismiss the case in the summer of 2010 to withdraw the case view, we can cancel the standard is divided into four stages, each stage has different characteristics. This article from the macro grasp the general direction of each generation to revoke the standard, the same cause for each generation to revoke the differences between the standards and then observe from the micro level, in order to better In order to understand the change trend of the four generation revocation standard, the article through the study of the revocation standard, in order to promote the development of the ICSID arbitration system and protect the interests of the parties.
This paper consists of introduction, text, conclusion of three parts, of which the body is divided into four parts. Through the research on the standard of ICSID arbitral awards revocation of the four generation, has carried on the elaboration to each generation of cancellation standards from macro and micro perspective, analysis of trends in each generation and influence on ICSID arbitration system.
The first part summarizes the development of ICSID standard of the four generation of revocation of arbitral awards. First from the macro grasp the characteristics of each generation of revocation standards. And then briefly introduces the representative of each generation of the withdrawal of the case and overall characteristics of each generation to revoke the standard, so that the reader and the standard features of the revocation of the case have a general understanding. Secondly, for the four generation of revocation criterion is taken into consideration, this division standard is discussed and put forward their own views.
The second part embarks from "the arbitration tribunal was ultra vires" point of view, the cancellation standards of four generation are discussed. The Special Committee on the arbitration tribunal "applicable law defects" to judge whether the arbitration tribunal of the ultra vires, obtained some every generation of the revocation standard. Through the analysis of the use of these cancellation standards in practice the special committee found, gradually expanding the scope, the cancellation standards began to decrease. This trend prompted the establishment of the ICSID appellate body growing louder, also called on the parties at the signing of a bilateral treaty, perfecting the applicable provisions of the applicable law.
The third part is to "seriously violates the basic rules of procedure" from the perspective of this four generation revocation standards. A special committee in the arbitration tribunal to judge whether a "serious violation of the basic rules of procedure", mainly from the "violations of the right to defence", "violation of rules of evidence", "unfair treatment principle" in three aspects of the judgment. According to representative case analysis, obtained each generation of the revocation criteria. The pleadings of the parties concerned right gradually aroused people's attention, the special committee for "serious violation of the basic rules of procedure" interpretation is gradually clear. These changes not only on the ICSID arbitration system to fully protect the rights of the parties, but also requires an arbitrator to continuously improve its own the quality.
The fourth part from the "statement of the award is not according to reason, the cancellation standards of the four generation are discussed. The Special Committee on the arbitration tribunal in the ruling" reasons "and" reason contradiction "to judge the arbitration tribunal constitutes the revocation of the subject. This part through the analysis of representative cases, found each generation of the cancellation standards gradually become wide, but still lack of uniform standards. This change requires the establishment of the precedent system in the ICSID arbitration institution, the arbitration tribunal may refer to precedents of arbitration, not only can prevent the case was dismissed, but also can improve the efficiency of arbitration.

【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D997.4

【参考文献】