论反倾销调查中“可获得事实”使用的实践误区

发布时间：2018-04-18 18:40

本文选题：反倾销 + “可获得事实”规则　；参考：《华东政法大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文以《反倾销协定》第6.8条“可获得事实”规则为研究对象,主要研究在反倾销实践中“可获得事实”规则的不当使用。通过对“可获得事实”规则不当使用的表现、后果及原因进行分析,提出防止“可获得事实”规则被不当使用的对策。全文共分三大部分。第一部分对“可获得事实”规则的立法作用及效果进行分析。主要介绍了“可获得事实”规则的立法目的、“可获得事实”规则在一些国家的实施情况、使用“可获得事实”规则应达到的效果及可能产生的问题。通过对“可获得事实”规则立法目的的分析,我们了解到“可获得事实”规则的立法目的应为保证调查机关顺利完成反倾销调查。第二部分对“可获得事实”规则的不当使用进行分析。首先探讨了应以何种标准来确定“可获得事实”规则是否存在不当使用。之后从宏观及微观两个方面对“可获得事实”规则是否存在不当使用进行探讨,得出“可获得事实”规则存在不当使用的结论。随后对造成“可获得事实”规则被不当使用的原因进行分析,并分析“可获得事实”规则不当使用可能造成的负面效果。第三部分对“可获得事实”规则的不当使用从国际法层面及国内法层面提出了对策。在国际法层面,具体提出了明确《反倾销协定》第6.8条的个别关键用词的含义。在国内法层面,具体提出了增加反倾销调查程序透明性及将公共利益原则引入以降低“可获得事实”规则被不当使用的可能性。
[Abstract]:This paper focuses on the "accessible facts" rule in Article 6.8 of the Anti-dumping Agreement, and mainly studies the improper use of the "available facts" rule in the practice of anti-dumping.Through the analysis of the expression, consequence and reason of the improper use of the rules of "available facts", the author puts forward some countermeasures to prevent the rules of "available facts" from being improperly used.The paper is divided into three parts.The first part analyzes the legislative function and effect of the "available facts" rule.This paper mainly introduces the legislative purpose of the rules of "available facts", the implementation of the rules of "available facts" in some countries, the effect of using the rules of "available facts" and the problems that may arise.Through the analysis of the legislative purpose of the "available facts" rule, we know that the legislative purpose of the "available facts" rule should be to ensure the smooth completion of the anti-dumping investigation by the investigating organ.The second part analyzes the improper use of the "available facts" rule.First of all, the paper discusses what criteria should be used to determine whether the "available facts" rule has been improperly used.After that, the author discusses whether there is improper use of the rules of "available facts" from the macro and micro aspects, and draws the conclusion that the rules of "available facts" are improperly used.Then it analyzes the causes of the improper use of the rules of "available facts", and analyzes the possible negative effects of the improper use of the rules of "available facts".In the third part, the author puts forward some countermeasures to the improper use of the rule of "available facts" from the aspects of international law and domestic law.At the level of international law, the meaning of individual key words in Article 6.8 of the ADA is specified.At the level of domestic law, it puts forward the possibility of increasing the transparency of anti-dumping investigation procedure and introducing the principle of public interest to reduce the possibility of improper use of the rule of "available facts".
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996.1

【参考文献】