现时利益重心地是惯常居所地法原则的价值导向

发布时间：2018-04-20 21:48

本文选题：属人法原则 + 惯常居所　；参考：《法学研究》2013年03期

【摘要】：惯常居所的界定是我国涉外民事关系法律适用法实施中的重要问题之一。各国立法和相关国际条约对惯常居所一般均无明确界定,其认定主要依靠法院的自由裁量,因个案而异。为避免法院因自由裁量而导致属人法适用的非确定性,应探寻并遵从惯常居所地法原则的价值导向,即对当事人现时利益重心予以关注。确定当事人的惯常居所时要对与当事人有关的各种利益进行考量,确定其现时利益重心地之所属法域,进而明确当事人与特定法域的联系。研究欧美主要国家关于惯常居所界定的实践并揭示惯常居所地法原则的价值导向,对实施我国法律具有重要启示。
[Abstract]:The definition of habitual residence is one of the most important issues in the application of civil law concerning foreign affairs. National legislation and relevant international treaties generally have no clear definition of habitual residence, and its determination mainly depends on the discretion of the court and varies from case to case. In order to avoid the indeterminacy of the application of personal law caused by the discretion of the court, the value orientation of the principle of habitual residence law should be explored and followed, that is to say, the focus of interest of the parties concerned should be paid more attention to. When determining the habitual residence of a party, it is necessary to consider the various interests related to the party, to determine the jurisdiction in which its current interest centre of interest is located, and then to clarify the relationship between the party and a particular jurisdiction. Studying the practice of defining habitual residence in Europe and America and revealing the value orientation of the principle of habitual residence have important implications for the implementation of Chinese law.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学;
【基金】：作者主持的2011年度国家社科基金重点项目“《涉外民事关系法律适用法》实施问题研究”(编号:11 AFX016)阶段性成果之一
【分类号】：D997

【参考文献】