简述我国外资并购国家安全审查法律制度
发布时间:2018-04-29 15:19
本文选题:外资并购 + 国家安全审查 ; 参考:《上海社会科学院》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:外资并购也称跨国并购。自上世纪90年代以来,全球掀起一股企业跨国并购的浪潮。在我国,随着经济全球化的发展,尤其是在2001年中国加入WTO后,跨国并购(外资并购)逐步取代“绿地投资”(Greenfield Investment)1成为外资在中国直接投资的主要形式之一。据创业投资与私募股权研究机构清科研究中心最新统计数据显示,2011年上半年中国市场共完成外资并购共34起,涉及金额28.05亿美元。外资并购刷新了2008年以来的记录。2 外资并购在我国境内的急速增长,不仅为我国经济发展带来了所急需的资金,还给我国民族企业带来了技术和管理经验。但跨国并购又如同一柄双刃剑,也存在着消极一面:跨国巨头们利用其资金和技术优势,通过直接并购我国企业,从而迅速形成市场垄断和优势,这就对我国企业和国家安全敲响了警钟。作为维护一国外资并购的安全的手段之一,外资并购国家安全审查制度在欧美发达国家已广泛采用,对于今天外资并购急剧增多的我国来说更应建立和不断完善我国外资并购国家安全审查制度,以维护我国的经济和国家安全,这也是本文选题的意义所在。 本文除引言和结论外,正文分为三章。第一章外资并购国家安全审查制度概述部分,重点理清本文主要的基本概念,“外资”、“外资并购”和“国家安全审查”。然后从制度建立的法理基础、我国建立国家安全审查制度的必要性和我国为东道国的外资并购典型案例三个方面来论述我国建立国家安全审查制度的理论基础。第二章通过比较研究美、德、日三个市场经济发达国家的外资并购国家安全审查制度,为我国建立外资并购国家安全审查制度提供借鉴的样板。第三章通过回顾总结借鉴我国现有立法不足之处,同时借鉴美欧主要国家制度的优点,为我国进一步构建和完善我国外资并购国家安全审查制度提出自己粗浅的建议和设想。
[Abstract]:Foreign M & A is also called transnational M & A. Since the 90's of last century, a wave of transnational M & A (M & A) has been launched all over the world. In China, with the development of economic globalization, especially after China's entry into WTO in 2001, transnational M & A (M & A) has gradually replaced "greenfield investment" and Greenfield Investment)1 has become one of the main forms of FDI in China. A total of 34 foreign mergers and acquisitions involving $2.805 billion were completed in the first half of 2011 in China, according to the latest statistics from Qingke Research Center, a venture capital and private equity research firm. Foreign M & A record since 2008 The rapid growth of foreign capital mergers and acquisitions in China has not only brought badly needed funds for the economic development of our country, but also brought technology and management experience to our national enterprises. However, as a double-edged sword, transnational M & A also has a negative side: multinational giants take advantage of their financial and technological advantages, and through direct mergers and acquisitions of Chinese enterprises, they quickly form market monopolies and advantages. This has sounded the alarm bell to our country enterprise and the national security. As one of the means to safeguard the security of foreign capital mergers and acquisitions, the national security review system of foreign capital mergers and acquisitions has been widely used in developed countries in Europe and America. In order to maintain the economy and national security of our country, it is necessary to establish and improve the national security review system of foreign capital mergers and acquisitions, which is the significance of this thesis. In addition to the introduction and conclusions, the text is divided into three chapters. The first chapter is an overview of the national security review system of foreign capital mergers and acquisitions, focusing on clarifying the main basic concepts of this paper, namely, "foreign capital", "foreign capital M & A" and "national security review". Then from the legal basis of the establishment of the system, the necessity of establishing the national security review system in our country and the typical cases of foreign capital merger and acquisition in China as the host country, this paper discusses the theoretical basis of establishing the national security review system in our country. The second chapter is a comparative study of the national security review system of foreign capital M & A in three developed countries with market economy, namely, America, Germany and Japan, which provides a model for our country to establish the national security review system of foreign capital mergers and acquisitions. The third chapter, by reviewing and summing up the shortcomings of our existing legislation, and drawing on the advantages of the major national systems of the United States and Europe, puts forward some suggestions and ideas for our country to further construct and perfect the national security review system of foreign capital mergers and acquisitions.
【学位授予单位】:上海社会科学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D996.1;F271
【引证文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 苏亚丽;中美能源投资国家安全审查制度比较研究[D];山西大学;2013年
,本文编号:1820489
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/1820489.html