论东京审判管辖权之争应当终结

发布时间：2018-04-29 20:35

本文选题：东京审判 + 远东国际军事法庭　；参考：《山东警察学院学报》2017年02期

【摘要】：远东国际军事法庭的管辖权直接关涉东京审判的合法性。法庭上的辩护方和日后的东京审判的否定派,主要从"胜者的法庭"和"事后法"两个方向质疑法庭管辖权的法律依据和法理基础。基于法庭文献和国际法原理的分析可以发现,东京审判管辖权在法律上有着明确的依据和坚实的基础,东京审判管辖权的确立反映了战争法观的演变、人道人权观念的进步以及国际法的渐进发展,实现了对战争与和平的"法的支配"。东京审判的合法性不容置疑,管辖权之争应当走向终结。
[Abstract]:The jurisdiction of the far East International military Court is directly related to the legality of the Tokyo trial. The defense in the court and the negatives of the Tokyo trial in the future mainly challenge the legal basis and the legal basis of the jurisdiction of the court from the two directions of "the court of the victor" and "the law of hindsight". Based on the analysis of the literature of the court and the principles of international law, it can be found that the Tokyo trial jurisdiction has a clear legal basis and a solid foundation, and the establishment of the Tokyo trial jurisdiction reflects the evolution of the concept of the law of war. The progress of the concept of human rights and the progressive development of international law have realized the rule of law over war and peace. The legitimacy of the Tokyo trial is beyond doubt, and the dispute over jurisdiction should come to an end.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院;
【分类号】：D997.9

【相似文献】