《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第17条评析

发布时间：2018-05-01 16:37

本文选题：涉外信托 + 《海牙信托公约》　；参考：《河北法学》2017年11期

【摘要】：《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第17条从立法体系和立法内容上均存在一定的缺陷,不适合我国涉外信托的发展及司法实务的需要。从立法史角度看,涉外信托法律适用规则的立法定位长期在物权、债权与主体制度中游移不定;从法律选择规则角度看,我国立法没有充分考虑涉外信托的动态性与复杂性,没有采用分割制;从法律适用方法角度看,我国立法没有为最密切联系方法留有适用空间。因此未来立法中,第一,应明确将涉外信托的法律适用规则从"民事主体"一章中分离,设立专章规定,置于"物权"章后,"债权"章前;第二,应允许当事人对信托的不同方面分别选择适用的法律,在当事人没有明确选择时法官可以对信托法律关系的不同方面适用不同的准据法;第三,应给予最密切联
[Abstract]:Article 17 of the Law on the legal Application of Foreign Civil Relations has some defects in both the legislative system and the content of legislation, which is not suitable for the development of foreign trust and the need of judicial practice in our country. From the angle of legislative history, the legislative orientation of the applicable rules of foreign trust law is in the property right, the creditor's right and the subject system for a long time, and from the angle of the law choice rule, our legislation has not fully considered the dynamic and complexity of the foreign trust. From the point of view of the applicable method of law, the legislation of our country has not left the applicable space for the most closely related method. Therefore, in the future legislation, firstly, the rules of application of the law concerning foreign trust should be clearly separated from the chapter of "civil subject", and a special chapter should be established, which should be placed after the chapter of "real right" and before the chapter of "creditor's rights"; second, The parties should be allowed to choose the applicable law for different aspects of the trust, and when the parties do not have a clear choice, the judge may apply different applicable law to different aspects of the legal relationship of the trust; third, the closest association shall be given
【作者单位】：西南政法大学国际法学院;
【基金】：2014年国家社科基金一般项目《法院地法倾向对策研究》(14BFX190) 重庆市法学会2016年度课题《涉外商事仲裁裁决撤销制度实证研究》(CFH2016B11)之阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D997.3

【相似文献】