国际投资条约中不排除措施条款的解释

发布时间：2018-05-06 21:42

本文选题：不排除措施条款 + 外部资源　；参考：《法学论坛》2013年06期

【摘要】：近些年来,国际投资条约中的不排除措施条款开始受到人们的普遍关注,除了其作为"安全阀"所具有的平衡东道国和外国投资者之间利益的作用外,一个重要的原因是仲裁庭援引外部资源(作为习惯国际法的国家危急情况条款和GATT"WTO法中的例外条款)对其进行解释所带来的适用困境。追根溯源,产生这种困境的根源竟然与仲裁庭引入外部资源的依据一样,都是《维也纳条约法公约》第31条第3款第3项"宽泛"的外延。为应对这一困境,仲裁机构可以排除习惯国际法的引入;国际社会可以达成协议对《维也纳条约法公约》第31条第3款第3项"宽泛"的外延进行限定;我国可以明确不排除措施条款的内容或"指向"以及删除或替代条款中的"必需的"一词。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the non-exclusionary measures clause in international investment treaties has begun to receive widespread attention, in addition to its role as a "safety valve" in balancing the interests of the host country and foreign investors. An important reason is the difficulty of application arising from the arbitral tribunal's invocation of external resources (as a national necessity clause in customary international law and an exception clause in the GATT WTO Act). In retrospect, the source of this dilemma is the same as the basis for the introduction of external resources by the arbitral tribunal, which is the "broad" extension of article 31, paragraph 3 (3), of the Vienna Convention on the Law of treaties. In response to this dilemma, the arbitral body could exclude the introduction of customary international law; the international community could agree to limit the "broad" extension of article 31, paragraph 3, subparagraph 3, of the Vienna Convention on the Law of treaties; We may expressly not exclude the content or "direction" of the measure clause and delete or replace the word "necessary" in the clause.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学法学院;
【基金】：中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目《国际投资仲裁中不排除措施条款适用问题研究》(13XNH039)的部分成果
【分类号】：D996.4

【参考文献】