中日东海大陆架划界的国际法分析

发布时间：2018-05-10 19:57

本文选题：东海大陆架 + 划界原则　；参考：《复旦大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：东海大陆架下蕴藏大量的油气资源被誉为第二中东1,这在一定程度引发了中日之间对大陆架权益的争夺。《联合国海洋法公约》第八十三条“海岸相向或相邻国家间大陆架界限的划定”虽然对划界问题所应当遵循的国际法渊源(即第一款所指《国际法院规约》第三十八条)、国际法程序(即第二款所指《海洋法公约》第十五部分)做出了相关规定,但是对于如何进行具体划界并没有给出实质性的指导意见,因而具体的划界规则仍然需要国家间通过谈判方式解决。这就导致中日之间东海大陆架划界争议迟迟未能得到解决,成为中日关系出现摩擦的导火索之一。如何妥善地在国际法框架内解决中日两国大陆架划界争端,需要进一步研究。本文以中日东海大陆架划界的国际法分析为研究主题,主要对中日东海大陆架划界争议的缘起、成因、国际法规定以及两国各自的主张展开分析,结合最新的国际法判例对中日东海大陆架划界争议解决的对策与前景展开了探究。本文分为序言和三章。序言主要探讨了本课题的研究背景、研究现状以及研究方法、内容与创新点。第一章是中日东海大陆架划界争端的基本背景,主要分析了大陆架的自然概念与法律概念,认为中日大陆架划界争议的根源是两国对油气资源和战略利益的争夺。第二章是中日东海大陆架划界的分歧与依据分析,主要分析了大陆架划界的国际法规定以及中日两国各自的大陆架划界方案,同时还分析了最新的国际法判例及其可能产生的指导意义；第三章是中日东海大陆架划界争议之解决对策探讨,主要分析了中日东海大陆架划界争议解决的协商解决、搁置争议共同开发以及其他相关途径的可能性。在此基础上,本文对如何解决中日大陆架划界争端提出了相关建议。最后是全文的简短结论。
[Abstract]:The East China Sea continental shelf contains a large amount of oil and gas resources known as the second East China 1, which to a certain extent has triggered a competition between China and Japan for the rights and interests of the continental shelf. Article 83 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea "countries with opposite or adjacent coasts Delineation of the limits of the Continental Shelf "although the sources of international law to be followed with regard to delimitation (i.e. article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice referred to in paragraph 1), international law procedures (i.e., the Convention on the Law of the Sea within the meaning of paragraph 2)" (5) the relevant provisions are made, However, there is no substantive guidance on how to carry out specific demarcation, so the specific delimitation rules still need to be settled by negotiation between States. As a result, the dispute over the delimitation of the continental shelf of the East China Sea between China and Japan has been delayed and become one of the fuses of friction between China and Japan. How to properly resolve the continental shelf delimitation dispute between China and Japan within the framework of international law needs further study. Based on the international law analysis of the delimitation of the continental shelf of the East China Sea between China and Japan, this paper mainly analyzes the origin, causes, provisions of international law and the respective claims of the two countries in the delimitation of the continental shelf of the East China Sea. The countermeasures and prospects for the settlement of the continental shelf delimitation dispute between China and Japan in the East China Sea are explored in the light of the latest international law jurisprudence. This article is divided into preface and three chapters. The preface mainly discusses the research background, research status, research methods, content and innovation of this subject. The first chapter is the basic background of the continental shelf delimitation dispute between China and Japan in the East China Sea. It mainly analyzes the natural and legal concepts of the continental shelf, and points out that the origin of the dispute between China and Japan is the scramble for oil and gas resources and strategic interests between the two countries. The second chapter is the analysis of the differences and basis of the delimitation of the continental shelf in the East China Sea. It mainly analyzes the international law provisions of the delimitation of the continental shelf and the respective continental shelf delimitation plans of China and Japan. At the same time, it also analyzes the latest international law jurisprudence and its possible guiding significance. Chapter three is the discussion on the settlement of the dispute over the delimitation of the continental shelf of the East China Sea, mainly the negotiation of the settlement of the dispute over the delimitation of the continental shelf of the East China Sea. Shelve the possibility of controversial co-development and other related approaches. On the basis of this, this paper puts forward some suggestions on how to resolve the continental shelf delimitation dispute between China and Japan. Finally, a brief conclusion of the full text.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D993.5

【参考文献】