反补贴中“一般基础设施”的法律判断标准探析——基于公共物品理论的视角

发布时间：2018-05-11 17:48

  本文选题：补贴 + 一般基础设施　； 参考：《法学家》2015年06期

【摘要】：对《补贴与反补贴措施协议》第1.1条(a)(1)(iii)中"一般基础设施"的判断,可借助公共物品理论对基础设施进行类型化识R%。具体而言,纯公共基础设施自动构成"一般基础设施",除非政府行为限制此类基础设施的使用;私人基础设施自动丧失"一般基础设施"的资格;准公共基础设施应首先被假定构成"一般基础设施",除非证据表明存在准入限制。准公共基础设施应进一步区别"俱乐部基础设施"和"公共池塘基础设施",并在符合比例性原则和普遍使用标准时构成"一般基础设施"。中国应对美国相关反补贴调查的基本思路,应是主张土地使用权和电力均构成"公共池塘基础设施",并分别根据普遍使用标准和比例性原则予以抗辩。
[Abstract]:To judge the "general infrastructure" in Article 1.1 of the Agreement on subsidies and countervailing measures, we can use the theory of public goods to type the infrastructure. In particular, pure public infrastructure automatically constitutes "general infrastructure" unless the use of such infrastructure is restricted by government action; private infrastructure automatically disqualifies from "general infrastructure"; Quasi-public infrastructure should first be assumed to constitute "general infrastructure" unless there is evidence of access restrictions. Quasi public infrastructure should further distinguish between "club infrastructure" and "public pond infrastructure" and constitute "general infrastructure" when it meets the principle of proportionality and universal standards of use. The basic idea of China's countervailing investigation in the United States should be to claim that land use right and electricity both constitute "public pond infrastructure", and to defend them respectively according to the universal use criteria and the principle of proportionality.
【作者单位】： 广东金融学院法律系;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金资助一般项目“WTO补贴规则与中国产业补贴政策的变革研究”(项目编号:12BFX139)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D996.1
，

本文编号：1874949