从中菲南海仲裁案看联合国海洋法公约附件七的设计缺陷

发布时间：2018-05-12 15:56

本文选题：联合国海洋法公约 + 附件七仲裁　；参考：《浙江大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：附件七强制仲裁是《联合国海洋法公约》的强制争端解决程序之一,也是一种兜底的管辖方式,除公约中规定的限制与例外,缔约国不可以任意排除仲裁法庭的强制管辖,并且满足一定条件时争端国可以单方面提起附件七仲裁。由于其强制性和单方意志性,附件七仲裁成为广泛应用的海洋争端解决程序之一。2013年1月菲律宾将其与中国在南海的争端单方提交附件七仲裁庭仲裁,2016年7月附件七仲裁庭对菲律宾单方就中菲南海争端提起的强制仲裁程序做出最终裁决,整个案件持续三年之久。不仅引发中国舆论的广泛关注,也使世界的目光聚焦中国南海。本文尝试从中菲南海仲裁案入手,分析附件七强制仲裁制度的设计缺陷。本文主体由四个部分构成。第一部分简单介绍了中菲南海仲裁案的经过及争端双方的诉求与态度,引入了附件七仲裁的概念。第二部详细分析附件七仲裁的性质、特征、适用的前提,为接下来的论证作铺垫。第三部分着重就附件七强制仲裁制度的设计缺陷进行分析说明,阐述了附件七仲裁在涉及领土主权判定上的标准模糊、"交换意见"的判断标准模糊、缺席仲裁制度导致公平性缺失等问题,同时说明中菲南海仲裁案得以在仲裁法庭进行最终裁决的原因就是强制仲裁制度的设计缺陷。最后,本文为今后中国面临海洋争端时的应对提出几点构想。
[Abstract]:Annex VII compulsory arbitration is one of the compulsory dispute settlement procedures of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and is also a modus operandi. States parties may not arbitrarily exclude the compulsory jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal, except for the limitations and exceptions provided for in the Convention, And when certain conditions are met, the dispute State may unilaterally initiate Annex VII arbitration. Because of its mandatory and unilateral will, Annex VII arbitration has become one of the widely used maritime dispute settlement procedures. In January 2013, the Philippines submitted its dispute with China in the South China Sea to the Annex VII Arbitration Tribunal, and in July 2016, the Annex VII Arbitration Tribunal singled out the Philippines on an ad hoc basis. The compulsory arbitration procedure initiated in the dispute over the Philippines and the South China Sea made the final decision. The whole case lasted for three years. It not only aroused the widespread concern of Chinese public opinion, but also made the eyes of the world focus on the South China Sea. This paper attempts to analyze the design defects of the mandatory arbitration system in Annex VII from the case of the South China Sea arbitration. The main body of this paper consists of four parts. The first part briefly introduces the process of the South China Sea arbitration case and the demands and attitudes of both parties to the dispute, and introduces the concept of Annex VII arbitration. The second part analyzes the nature, characteristics and applicable premise of Annex VII arbitration in detail, which paves the way for the following argumentation. The third part focuses on the analysis of the defects in the design of Annex VII compulsory arbitration system, expounds the ambiguity of the criteria of Annex VII arbitration concerning the determination of territorial sovereignty, and the ambiguity of the judgment criteria of "exchange of views". The absence of arbitration system leads to the lack of fairness and so on. At the same time, it explains that the reason why the arbitration case in the South China Sea can be decided in the arbitration court is the design defect of the compulsory arbitration system. Finally, this paper puts forward some ideas for China to deal with maritime disputes in the future.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D993.5

【参考文献】