海峡两岸投资保障的法律机制研究

发布时间：2018-05-18 06:36

本文选题：两岸投资 + 双向投资　；参考：《兰州大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：海峡两岸关系深入发展,双向投资等贸易活动非常活跃。在《海峡两岸经济合作框架协议》基础上,构建两岸投资保障的法律机制已是现实诉求。文章先从解析现状着手,指出大陆关于两岸投资保障的法制建设具有阶段性、台湾关于两岸投资保障法制建设具有滞后性以及两岸投资保障协议的缺位的客观现实。进一步指出及时构建海峡两岸投资保障法律机制,可以有助于两岸经济合作的规范化和制度化的建设,也有益于两岸经济进一步地深入合作和共同发展,更有利于祖国和平统一大业的早日实现等突出的时代意义。文章采用比较研究方法,先后剖析了大陆与港澳CEPA模式、北美自由贸易协定、中国—东盟自由贸易区模式、WTO中的TRIMs中关于的投资保障法律机制的经验,寻求其对两岸投资保法律机制的启示。文章认为须在恪守“一个中国”的政治理念,清楚海峡两岸关系的特殊性,认知海峡两岸关系的复杂性的基础上,构建海峡两岸的投资保障法律机制。提出构建两岸投资保障机制可采取早日协商签署两岸投资保障协议、采用国民待遇和最惠国待遇、肯定投资利润的转移、建立具有两岸特色的投资争端解决和仲裁机制、提高法律法规透明度等具体措施。
[Abstract]:Cross-straits relations have developed in depth, and bilateral investment and other trade activities have been very active. On the basis of the Framework Agreement on Economic Cooperation between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, it is a realistic demand to construct a legal mechanism for investment protection between the two sides of the strait. The article begins with the analysis of the present situation and points out that the mainland's legal construction on cross-strait investment security has stages, and Taiwan's legal construction on cross-strait investment security has lag and the objective reality of the absence of cross-strait investment guarantee agreement. It is further pointed out that the timely establishment of a legal mechanism for cross-strait investment protection can contribute to the standardization and institutionalization of cross-strait economic cooperation, and is also conducive to further in-depth cooperation and common development of the cross-strait economy. More conducive to the motherland's peaceful reunification of the great cause of early realization and other prominent significance of the times. By using the method of comparative study, this paper analyzes the experience of the legal mechanism of investment protection in the TRIMs of the mainland, Hong Kong and Macao, North American Free Trade Agreement and China-ASEAN Free Trade area. Seeking its enlightenment to the legal mechanism of cross-strait investment protection. The article holds that the legal mechanism of investment guarantee should be constructed on the basis of adhering to the political concept of "one China", making clear the particularity of cross-strait relations and recognizing the complexity of cross-strait relations. It is proposed that the establishment of a cross-strait investment guarantee mechanism may include early consultation and signing of cross-strait investment guarantee agreements, adoption of national treatment and most-favored-nation treatment, affirmation of the transfer of investment profits, and establishment of an investment dispute settlement and arbitration mechanism with cross-strait characteristics. Improve the transparency of laws and regulations and other specific measures.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D997;D922.29

【参考文献】