论ECFA框架下投资争端解决机制的构建

发布时间：2018-05-19 20:25

本文选题：两岸经济合作框架协议 + ECFA　；参考：《复旦大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：2010年6月29日,《两岸经济合作框架协议》(简称ECFA)正式签署,其后两岸双向投资活动频繁,投资争端也日益增多。然而,当前两岸尚未形成专门的投资争端解决机制,建立投资争端解决机制具有现实紧迫感及必要性。本文共分为三章,首先阐明了海峡两岸投资争端的定义、类型及性质；其次论述了海峡两岸当前争端解决模式,并重点分析了可供借鉴的国际投资争端解决机制,以此作为构建新机制的参考和借鉴；最后结合海峡两岸当前特色,分别针对三种不同类型的投资争端提出构建和完善的建议和构想。第一章将首先剖析研究对象,对海峡两岸投资争端做整体介绍。本文拟先介绍两岸投资争端发展变化的历史,界定“两岸投资争端”内涵和类型。通过分类研究的方法,将两岸投资争端分成私人间投资争端、私人与投资地政府间投资争端及政府间投资争端三种争端类型加以考察。全文将依循此争端分类标准,在三种争端分类的基础上分别对各种投资争端继续进行深入的分析探讨。本章接着将从法理角度对投资争端的双重性质进行分析。第二章将对三种类型的投资争端进行比较法的研究,本章将分别选取国际上典型的争端解决机制加以具体分析研究,重点分析各种制度的运行模式、优缺点及探讨可供两岸投资争端解决机制加以借鉴的制度设计。对于第一种争端,本章论述了我国两岸间投资争端解决方面的立法及司法实践现状,并提出该制度完善的两个路径与方向。对于第二种争端,本文将详细分析ICSID、NAFTA、EU三种不同模式的相关规定,并就三种模式的法律移植问题进行分析。对于第三种争端,本文将介绍WTO及CEPA模式的内容,并重点分析对其借鉴的可能性。第三章将结合两岸当前投资争端解决方面立法与司法实践现状,对两岸私人间投资争端解决机制的完善、私人与投资地政府间争端问题的仲裁机制的构建、政府间投资争端解决机制模式的选择、争端预防机制及解决机制的构建提出自己的建议。本文的目的,主要是希望能够在对海峡两岸投资争端解决机制现状基础做全面深入的评估的基础上,吸收国内外实践经验,提出构建和善两岸投资争端解决机制的建议。
[Abstract]:On June 29, 2010, the Framework Agreement on Cross-Strait Economic Cooperation (ECFAA) was formally signed. After that, the two-way investment activities between the two sides of the strait were frequent and investment disputes were increasing day by day. However, at present, there is no special investment dispute settlement mechanism between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, and it is urgent and necessary to set up an investment dispute settlement mechanism. This paper is divided into three chapters. Firstly, it clarifies the definition, types and nature of cross-strait investment disputes, and then discusses the current dispute settlement model of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, and focuses on the analysis of the international investment dispute settlement mechanism that can be used for reference. Finally, combining with the current characteristics of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, the author puts forward some suggestions and ideas for the construction and perfection of three different types of investment disputes. The first chapter will analyze the research object and introduce the investment dispute between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. This paper first introduces the history of the development and changes of cross-strait investment disputes, and defines the connotation and types of cross-strait investment disputes. In this paper, the investment disputes between Taiwan and Taiwan are divided into three types: private investment disputes, private investment disputes and intergovernmental investment disputes. Based on the classification of three kinds of disputes, this paper will continue to analyze and discuss the investment disputes in depth. This chapter will then analyze the dual nature of investment disputes from the perspective of legal theory. The second chapter will carry on the comparative research to three kinds of investment disputes, this chapter will select the international typical dispute settlement mechanism separately to carry on the concrete analysis research, emphatically analyzes each kind of system movement pattern, The advantages and disadvantages and the system design which can be used for reference by the investment dispute settlement mechanism of both sides of the strait are discussed. For the first kind of dispute, this chapter discusses the current situation of legislation and judicial practice in the settlement of investment disputes between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, and puts forward two ways and directions for the perfection of the system. For the second kind of dispute, this paper will analyze the relevant provisions of three different models of ICSIDN NAFTAEU in detail, and analyze the legal transplantation of the three models. For the third kind of dispute, this paper will introduce the content of WTO and CEPA mode, and analyze the possibility of using for reference. The third chapter will combine the current situation of legislation and judicial practice in the settlement of investment disputes between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, perfect the settlement mechanism of the private investment disputes between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, and construct the arbitration mechanism of the disputes between the private and the local governments. The choice of intergovernmental investment dispute settlement mechanism, the construction of dispute prevention mechanism and settlement mechanism are put forward. The purpose of this paper is to make a comprehensive and in-depth evaluation of the present situation of the investment dispute settlement mechanism between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, absorb the domestic and foreign practical experience, and put forward some suggestions for the establishment of a friendly settlement mechanism for investment disputes between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.1;D922.29

【参考文献】