拨开“事后法”的迷雾--反思东京审判中的“事后法”争议

发布时间：2018-05-23 10:10

本文选题：正义 + 事后法　；参考：反思东京审判中的“事后法”争议

【摘要】：围绕战争罪犯的定罪问题而产生的分歧与斗争成为二战后战犯审判的基本议题,"事后法"问题则是其中最为重要的法律争议。东京审判中事后法的争议可以归结为两个方面的问题:一是司法过程是否存在瑕疵,二是法律价值之间是否存在冲突。以控辩审三方的视角反思重重迷雾中的事后法问题,试图拨开其迷雾,呈现了东京审判事后法争议的基本图景。通过回溯国际司法审判战争罪犯的先例以及国际法对于战争非法化认定的基本事实,并结合分析事后法的基本法理意涵,指出通过司法方式审判战争罪犯不仅有先例可循,而且拥有较为充分的法理正当性,实质上,东京审判所涉及的罪名并不构成事后法。东京审判需要实践法治的惩恶扬善、保障人权的基本功能,同时更需要实现人类对于人权、法治与正义的追求。
[Abstract]:The differences and struggles about the conviction of war criminals have become the basic topic of war criminals' trial after World War II, and the issue of "afterwards law" is the most important legal dispute. The dispute over ex post facto law in Tokyo trial can be divided into two aspects: one is whether there are defects in the judicial process and the other is whether there is a conflict between the legal values. From the perspective of prosecution and trial, the author reflects on the problem of ex post law in the fog, tries to dispel the fog, and presents the basic picture of the dispute over the ex post judgment in Tokyo. By looking back at the precedents of the international judicial trial of war criminals and the basic facts recognized by international law as to the illegality of war, and combining with the analysis of the basic legal implications of the afterwards law, it is pointed out that there are not only precedents to be followed in the trial of war criminals by judicial means, In fact, the charges involved in the Tokyo trial do not constitute ex post facto law. Tokyo trial needs to practice the rule of law to punish evil, protect the basic functions of human rights, but also to realize the human rights, the rule of law and justice.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学行政法学院;
【基金】：国家人权教育与培训基地西南政法大学人权研究院2015年度人权专项课题研究项目(HRC2015-BS04) 2016年重庆市社科规划年度项目《基层社会治理中多元规范的整合研究》(2016QNSH18)
【分类号】：D995

【相似文献】