死刑不引渡原则探析

发布时间：2018-05-27 21:27

本文选题：死刑不引渡 + 引渡法　；参考：《外交学院》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：“死刑不引渡原则”作为引渡的一项重要原则，虽然出现较晚，但发展迅速，并被广泛应用于引渡实践中。随着国际人权运动的日益推进，废除死刑运动的日趋高涨，死刑不引渡原则呈现出刚性化趋势。从2000年中国引渡法诞生对死刑不引渡原则采取回避态度，，到2004年余振东案的灵活处理，再到2006年中西引渡条约签订首次在引渡条约中写入死刑不引渡原则，中国对“死刑不引渡”在认识上有了很大的改观。本文通过对死刑不引渡原则的历史沿革、法理基础、发展趋势进行论述，并结合中外典型案例特别是肖特案、索艾林案、艾乐案以及杨沃亮案、余振东案加以论证分析，最终就此问题中国在引渡立法、条约缔结等领域所面临的困境，如何理性接受死刑不引渡，在引渡立法和引渡实践中加以完善进行综合论述。
[Abstract]:As an important principle of extradition, the principle of non-extradition of death penalty has developed rapidly and has been widely used in extradition practice. With the development of international human rights movement and abolition of death penalty, the principle of non-extradition of death penalty shows a trend of rigidity. From the birth of China's extradition Law in 2000 to the avoidance of the principle of non-extradition of the death penalty, to the flexible handling of the Yu Zhendong case in 2004, and to the fact that the Sino-Western extradition Treaty was signed in 2006 for the first time, the principle of non-extradition of the death penalty was included in the extradition treaty. China has greatly improved its understanding of death penalty and not extradition. This paper discusses the historical evolution, the legal basis and the developing trend of the principle of non-extradition of death penalty, and analyses the typical cases, especially the Schott case, the Suilin case, the Arle case, the Yang Waliang case and the Yu Zhendong case. Finally, China faces the dilemma in the fields of extradition legislation and treaty conclusion. How to accept the death penalty rationally and not extradite is discussed comprehensively in extradition legislation and extradition practice.
【学位授予单位】：外交学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D998.2

【参考文献】