国际商事仲裁临时措施问题研究
本文选题:国际商事仲裁 + 临时措施 ; 参考:《广西大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:伴随经济全球化的进一步发展,国际贸易的不断推进,各国之间的经济贸易往来逐渐增多,由此引发的国际间的商事纠纷也越来越多。由于自身便捷、中立、灵活、自治等特点,国际商事仲裁日益受到青睐。临时措施在仲裁中有着举足轻重的地位,它一定程度上有效的避免了争议标的的损坏与灭失,保障了仲裁程序的顺利进行,保障了当事人的权利以及仲裁裁决的公平性。但是,即便如此,在实践当中临时措施还是存在着不少的难点与问题,比如临时措施申请的提出时间与处理主体,以及临时措施的域外执行都面临不少障碍。基于此,各国已经开始逐步完善有关临时措施的立法规定,联合国国际贸易法委员会也与2006年对《联合国国际商事仲裁示范法》中临时措施的相关条文进行了修订。而在我国,由于法律条文的不尽完善,实践操作性的缺少,导致我国的国际商事仲裁法律制度脱离了国际上的普遍做法与发展趋势,毫无疑问这会阻碍我国国际商事仲裁今后的发展。因此我国对临时措施的立法完善是必须也是必要的。 本文主要对国际商事仲裁临时保全措施的若干问题及其在中国的现状与完善问题进行了论述。全文共分四章,内容上涉及了国际商事仲裁临时保全措施的特征、形式等基本问题,主要论述了国际商事仲裁临时保全措施的发布和执行问题,并针对我国相关法律规定提出了自己的完善建议。 第一章是对临时措施的概述部分,主要介绍了临时措施的概念、分类,包括学理分类和《示范法》的规定。 第二章是临时措施的发布问题,主要为两方面问题,包括临时措施发布权模式和临时措施发布时间,根据国际上各国的立法实践,重点阐述了发布权的几种模式。除此之外还包括临时措施的发布条件。 第三章是临时措施的执行问题,此部分除了介绍部分国家临时措施域外执行的实践外,主要围绕临时措施的域外执行涉及的两个问题展开论述。 第四章是中国临时保全措施的现状和完善建议,本文在此部分主要分析了中国立法和司法方面的不足,进而就如何完善我国仲裁临时保全措施提出相关建议。
[Abstract]:With the further development of economic globalization and the continuous promotion of international trade, the economic and trade exchanges between countries are gradually increasing, which leads to more and more international commercial disputes. Due to its convenience, neutrality, flexibility, autonomy and other characteristics, international commercial arbitration is increasingly favored. Interim measures play an important role in arbitration. To a certain extent, they effectively avoid the damage and loss of the object of dispute, ensure the smooth progress of the arbitration procedure, protect the rights of the parties and the fairness of the arbitration award. However, even in practice, there are still many difficulties and problems in the practice of interim measures, such as the time of application for interim measures and the subject of processing, as well as the extraterritorial implementation of interim measures are facing a lot of obstacles. Based on this, countries have begun to improve the relevant legislative provisions on interim measures, and the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law revised the relevant provisions of interim measures in the United Nations Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration in 2006. In our country, due to the imperfect legal provisions and the lack of practical operation, the legal system of international commercial arbitration in our country deviates from the general practice and development trend in the world. There is no doubt that this will hinder the future development of international commercial arbitration in China. Therefore, it is necessary and necessary for our country to perfect the legislation of interim measures. This paper mainly discusses some problems of interim measures of protection in international commercial arbitration and its present situation and perfection in China. The full text is divided into four chapters, which involve the characteristics and forms of interim measures of protection in international commercial arbitration, and mainly discuss the issue and implementation of interim measures of protection in international commercial arbitration. And in view of the relevant laws and regulations of our country put forward their own perfect suggestions. The first chapter is an overview of interim measures, mainly introduces the concept of interim measures, classification, including the academic classification and the provisions of the Model Law. The second chapter is about the issue of interim measures, mainly in two aspects, including the mode and time of issuing interim measures. According to the legislative practice of various countries in the world, this paper focuses on several modes of the right to issue. It also includes conditions for the release of interim measures. The third chapter is about the implementation of interim measures. In addition to introducing the practice of the extraterritorial implementation of interim measures in some countries, this part mainly discusses the two issues involved in the extraterritorial implementation of interim measures. The fourth chapter is the status quo of interim measures of protection in China and suggestions for improvement. In this part, the author mainly analyzes the shortcomings of China's legislation and judicature, and then puts forward some relevant suggestions on how to perfect the interim measures of protection in arbitration in China.
【学位授予单位】:广西大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D997.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 朱玉璋;;国际商事仲裁中临时保全措施的决定与执行[J];安徽教育学院学报;2006年04期
2 任明艳;;国际商事仲裁中仲裁员发布临时性保全措施问题[J];北京仲裁;2007年01期
3 牛岩;;“初步命令”初探——联合国《国际商事仲裁示范法》的新规定[J];北京仲裁;2007年03期
4 任明艳;;《纽约公约》项下临时性保全措施的承认和执行[J];北京仲裁;2008年01期
5 张恒;;论美国仲裁协会国际仲裁规则中的紧急保全措施[J];北京仲裁;2008年03期
6 宣增益;;西方国家有关临时措施的承认与执行[J];中国司法;2008年03期
7 王玉婷;;全球化下的国际商事仲裁临时措施制度——兼论我国相关制度的完善[J];对外经贸实务;2006年04期
8 何秋竺;;论国际商事仲裁临时行为保全制度的构建[J];湖北社会科学;2010年09期
9 杜开林;对一起仲裁证据保全案的评析——兼论现行仲裁证据保全法律规定的不足[J];法律适用;2003年05期
10 邓杰;完善我国仲裁中的财产保全制度[J];法学杂志;2003年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 汪波;[N];法制日报;2006年
2 赵千喜;[N];人民法院报;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 鲁珊珊;《国际商事仲裁示范法》临时措施制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2007年
2 邹素娟;国际商事仲裁临时措施法律研究[D];南昌大学;2008年
3 花卉;论国际商事仲裁临时措施[D];中国政法大学;2008年
,本文编号:1951304
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/1951304.html