自贸区仲裁规则的冷静思考

发布时间：2018-06-02 10:01

本文选题：自贸区仲裁规则 + 效率　；参考：《上海财经大学学报》2015年02期

【摘要】：《中国(上海)自由贸易试验区仲裁规则》增加了当事人意思自治的程度和仲裁庭的权限,试图与最新的国际仲裁规则保持一致,但过于"国际化"的规则却与我国《民事诉讼法》与《仲裁法》的立法难以衔接。看似创新性的开放仲裁员名册制虽然有利于扩大当事人意思自治程度,但可能会延长仲裁期限、降低仲裁效率。仲裁庭临时措施决定权、紧急仲裁庭、合并仲裁制等看起来有助于提高仲裁效率,但因未能得到立法的支撑而可能在实践运行中难以取得良好的效果,并可能降低仲裁效率、牺牲程序公正价值。仲裁第三人的权利义务不明,会影响仲裁程序的进行。国际经验的吸纳不应当是简单的条款移植,而应保证引进的可操作性。因此,有必要通过附则的形式,对该规则进行补充说明和修订。
[Abstract]:The Arbitration rules of the China (Shanghai) Free Trade Test area increased the degree of party autonomy and the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal in an attempt to maintain consistency with the latest international arbitration rules. However, the rules of "internationalization" are difficult to link up with the legislation of our country's Civil procedure Law and Arbitration Law. The seemingly innovative open roster of arbitrators may extend the term of arbitration and reduce the efficiency of arbitration, although it may help to expand the degree of party autonomy. The decision on interim measures by the arbitral tribunal, the emergency arbitration tribunal and the merger of arbitration system seem to help to improve the efficiency of arbitration, but due to the failure to be supported by legislation, it may be difficult to achieve good results in practice and may reduce the efficiency of arbitration. Sacrifice the value of procedural justice. The ambiguity of the rights and obligations of the third party in arbitration will affect the proceeding of arbitration. The absorption of international experience should not be a simple term transplant, but should ensure the operation of the introduction. Therefore, it is necessary to supplement and amend the rules through the form of by-laws.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学国际法学院;
【基金】：2012年度司法部国家法制与法学理论研究项目“涉外民事司法环境优化机制研究”(12SFB2055)
【分类号】：D997.4;F752.8

【参考文献】