十九世纪国际法学中的中国叙述

发布时间：2018-06-03 17:10

本文选题：国际法 + 实证主义　；参考：《法学家》2012年05期

【摘要】：19世纪国际法学的核心思维结构是"非政治"的实证主义。通过检视该时期国际法学文本中关于中国的表述,可以清晰地考察出这种思维结构的特征。界定中国等非西方国家是否拥有"国际法共同体"身份资格的"文明"标准,事实上是不清晰的。随着实证主义思维的渐趋得势,对于鸦片战争本身合法性的探讨,逐渐退出历史舞台。对不平等条约合法性的判别,仅限于依据契约法的形式规则,而忽略了国际间武力关系不对等的残酷现实。"文明"标准的晦暗不清,并未阻止这一话语本身被国际政治现实所利用,而日本则是这方面的最杰出学生。由于拒绝思考"政治"议题,国际法学对19世纪帝国主义在中国等国的扩张非但不能限制,反而在事实上予以默认。在对学科历史进行回顾的基础上,新时代国际法学家有必要对自身的方法论保持警醒,并更负责任地投入到"政治"议题中去。
[Abstract]:The core thinking structure of international law in the 19 th century is non-political positivism. By examining the expression of China in the international legal texts of this period, we can clearly find out the characteristics of this thinking structure. It is not clear to define whether China and other non-western countries possess the status of "international law community". With the development of positivism, the discussion of the legitimacy of the Opium War gradually withdrew from the stage of history. The judgment on the legality of unequal treaties is limited to the formal rules of the law of contract and ignores the cruel reality of unequal international relations of force. " The obscurity of civilisation standards has not prevented the discourse itself from being used by international political realities, and Japan is the most prominent student in this field. By refusing to consider the issue of "politics", international jurisprudence has tacitly acquiesced in the expansion of 19th century imperialism in China and other countries. On the basis of reviewing the history of the subject, it is necessary for the international jurists of the new era to be alert to their own methodology and to devote themselves more responsibly to the issue of "politics".
【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D99

【共引文献】