再论商标平行进口
发布时间:2018-06-05 14:22
本文选题:商标平行进口 + 法律关系三要素 ; 参考:《中国社会科学院研究生院》2011年硕士论文
【摘要】:商标平行进口问题由来已久,它是伴随着知识产权的发展和国际贸易自由化的推进而产生的。法律界对于商标平行进口的禁与行争议颇多,主要是从知识产权的权利用尽理论和地域性原则入手来讨论,最近几年也有文章从商标的功能论着手来探讨,取得了一定进展。本文试图避开商标平行进口的禁与行问题,不追求从抽象层面得出一个确切结论,而是希望找到一个解决该问题的办法。首先,笔者利用法学基本理论,通过法律关系的三要素(主体、客体、内容)来认识商标平行进口,指出了目前在该问题上广泛存在的一些认识误区,同时从基本法理的角度来探讨进口国商标权人的权利,特别是“平行进口权”问题。在以上认识的基础上,笔者分析了支持和反对商标平行进口的两种理论(权利用尽理论和地域性原则),并得出这两种理论并不能很好的解决商标平行进口的争论。由于商标平行进口问题的实质是各利益群体特别是各国利益的博弈,笔者在对各国立法和司法现状解析的基础上结合论文前半部分对商标平行进口问题的基本法理分析,得出结论,认为中国目前解决平行进口问题暂时没有必要专门立法,而是可以通过商标的功能理论,在现有法律的基础上,具体案件具体分析,以最大限度地维护本国利益,同时在各种不同的利益群体中找到平衡点。
[Abstract]:The problem of trademark parallel import has a long history, which comes into being with the development of intellectual property and the promotion of international trade liberalization. There are a lot of disputes about the prohibition and practice of trademark parallel import in the legal circles, which are mainly discussed from the theory of exhaustion of intellectual property rights and the principle of regionalism. In recent years, some articles have been discussed from the perspective of trademark function theory, and some progress has been made. This paper attempts to avoid the problem of parallel import of trademarks and does not seek to draw an exact conclusion from the abstract level, but to find a solution to this problem. First of all, the author uses the basic theory of law, through the three elements of legal relationship (subject, object, content) to understand the parallel import of trademarks, pointed out that there are some misunderstanding in this issue. At the same time, this paper discusses the rights of trademark owners in importing countries, especially the issue of parallel import rights from the point of view of basic legal theory. On the basis of the above understanding, the author analyzes the two theories of supporting and opposing trademark parallel import (the exhaustion of rights theory and the regional principle), and concludes that these two theories can not solve the dispute of trademark parallel import. Because the essence of trademark parallel import is the game of the interests of various interest groups, especially the national interests, the author analyzes the basic legal theory of trademark parallel import on the basis of the analysis of the legislation and judicial status of various countries, combined with the first half of the thesis. It is concluded that there is no need for special legislation to solve the problem of parallel import in China at present. Instead, we can use the functional theory of trademarks, on the basis of existing laws, to make concrete analysis of specific cases in order to maximize the protection of our own interests. At the same time in a variety of different interest groups to find a balance.
【学位授予单位】:中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D997.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李明德;美国商标法中的平行进口[J];中华商标;2002年07期
2 康佑发;;商标平行进口国际比较分析[J];中华商标;2009年06期
3 代高洁;;商标平行进口的反垄断法规制[J];创新;2010年03期
4 谭红,吴韶艳;商标平行进口“真品”例外简介[J];电子知识产权;2004年06期
5 兰宜生;国际灰市场的发展及其影响[J];国际贸易问题;2001年04期
6 黄晖;内外有别——商标权利用尽的判例与立法[J];国际贸易;1999年04期
7 余翔;实质性差别——美国商标权耗尽与平行进口法律演变及现行准则[J];国际贸易;2001年03期
8 赵阳;吕瑛;;商标商品平行进口的竞争法分析[J];甘肃政法成人教育学院学报;2007年03期
9 马宗文;;垄断亦或自由竞争——我国对待商标平行进口的应然选择[J];开封教育学院学报;2008年03期
10 张慧霞;;商标平行进口中的“真品”研究[J];徐州工程学院学报(社会科学版);2010年01期
,本文编号:1982285
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/1982285.html