利益平衡与美国文化财产返还诉讼时效制度的演进

发布时间：2018-06-10 18:46

  本文选题：美国 + 文化财产返还　； 参考：《学术交流》2016年09期

【摘要】：美国的诉讼时效制度在传统上因循英格兰法的规定,其中关于文化财产返还之诉的时效制度主要发展出的理论有"要求并被拒绝规则"与"发现规则"。同时,在两规则发展中出现的"勤勉尽责"、"迟误抗辩"以及"实质发现"等在经过判例的确认后也都成为美国文化财产返还诉讼中现行时效制度的组成部分。其于司法实践中通过不断地自我矫正而演进并趋于完善的制度设计,综合了有关公序良俗、文化归源、国家利益与当事人权利维护等多方面的公私利益平衡,体现了现代司法的价值平衡理念。这样的制度设定对国际文化财产的保护和流失文化财产返还意义深远。
[Abstract]:The statute of limitations system in the United States has traditionally followed the provisions of English law, in which the prescription system for the return of cultural property mainly develops theories such as "requirement and rejected rule" and "discovery rule". At the same time, "diligence due diligence", "delay error defense" and "substantial discovery", which appeared in the development of the two rules, have also become part of the current statute of limitations system in American cultural property return litigation after the confirmation of the case law. In the judicial practice, the system design, which evolves and tends to be perfect through the self-correction, synthesizes the balance of public order and good custom, cultural return, national interest and the protection of the rights of the parties, and so on. It embodies the idea of value balance of modern justice. The establishment of such a system is of great significance to the protection of international cultural property and the return of lost cultural property.
【作者单位】： 吉林大学国家司法文明协同创新中心;法学院;理论法学研究中心;
【基金】：教育部重点研究基地重大项目“民生政治时代的人权保障研究”(14JJD820006) 吉林大学重大课题培育项目“中国特色国际法治理论体系研究”(2015ZDPY07)
【分类号】：D997.1
，

本文编号：2004225