国际商事仲裁协议研究
本文选题:国际商事仲裁协议 + 《纽约公约》 ; 参考:《大连海事大学》2013年博士论文
【摘要】:二十世纪五十年代以来,国际商事仲裁得到了前所未有的发展,尤其是在二十世纪末全球化浪潮的推动下,伴随着各国经济交往的日益加剧以及各类贸易的频繁往来,争议也不断增多,而各国在司法主权上从不轻易做出让步,这也使得国际商事仲裁获得了更大的发展机遇。“再加上仲裁本身所具有的自治性、灵活性、保密性、民间性等鲜明特点,使之赢得当事人的普遍青睐,从而也得到了长足的发展。” 本文第1章从国际商事仲裁协议的产生开始,介绍了国际商事仲裁协议的历史演进及所坚持的基本理念,并在此基础之上对国际商事仲裁的性质进行了分析。 第2章介绍国际商事仲裁协议的形式,分别从《纽约公约》、《国际商事仲裁示范法》以及国际上主要的国家的立法规定进行了介绍,并在此基础上分析了国际商事仲裁协议的发展趋势,结合各国立法和实践的分析,对我国有关仲裁协议形式的立法和司法实践进行了论述。 第3章介绍了国际商事仲裁协议的实质内容,从签订仲裁协议当事人的主体资格、请求仲裁的意思表示以及可仲裁性等方面分别进行了论述,并就此讨论了我国现行仲裁法对实质要件的要求;最后本章综合对国际商事仲裁协议的内容进行了梳理。 第4章和第5章是本文最为重要的章节,这两章对国际商事仲裁协议的法律适用问题分开进行讨论。首先对国际商事仲裁协议所在的主协议或原合同的法律适用以及如何来选择法律进行了探讨,其次对国际商事仲裁协议自身的法律适用进行了分析,即关于仲裁协议的订立要件、效力等如何适用法律来决定的问题。由于国际商事仲裁协议条款往往是在国际商事合同之中,只是以一个条款的形式出现,而且在这些合同之中往往只约定了一个实体问题的法律适用条款,并未对商事仲裁协议的法律适用进行约定,以致产生了许多的问题。本文将两者分开来论述,并对未约定商事仲裁协议法律适用条款的问题如何来适用法律进行了论述。 第6章介绍了国际商事仲裁的独立性理论,从该理论产生的渊源说起,介绍了该理论的根基、各种学说以及实践中所存在的争议,最后结合我国的实践分析了仲裁协议独立性理论在我国的确立和应用情况。 文章的最后一章总结了我国国际商事仲裁协议的立法和实践,并在此基础上指出了现有的不足,提出了完善的建议。
[Abstract]:Since the 1950s, international commercial arbitration has been an unprecedented development, especially in the end of the twentieth century driven by the wave of globalization, with the increasingly intensified economic exchanges between countries and frequent exchanges of various types of trade. Disputes are also increasing, and countries never make concessions on judicial sovereignty, which makes international commercial arbitration gain more opportunities for development. "coupled with the distinctive features of autonomy, flexibility, confidentiality, and folklore in arbitration itself, it has won the general favor of the parties and has also made considerable progress." The first chapter of this paper begins with the emergence of international commercial arbitration agreement, introduces the historical evolution of international commercial arbitration agreement and its basic concept, and analyzes the nature of international commercial arbitration on this basis. Chapter 2 introduces the form of international commercial arbitration agreement, including the New York Convention, the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration and the legislative provisions of major international countries. On this basis, the author analyzes the development trend of international commercial arbitration agreement, and discusses the legislation and judicial practice about the form of arbitration agreement in our country combined with the analysis of legislation and practice in various countries. Chapter 3 introduces the substantive content of the international commercial arbitration agreement, discusses the subject qualification of the parties to the arbitration agreement, the expression of intention to request arbitration and the arbitrability, etc. In this paper, the author discusses the substantive requirements of China's current arbitration law, and summarizes the content of the international commercial arbitration agreement in this chapter. Chapter 4 and chapter 5 are the most important chapters in this paper. First of all, it discusses the legal application of the main agreement or the original contract of the international commercial arbitration agreement and how to choose the law, and then analyzes the legal application of the international commercial arbitration agreement itself. That is to say, how to apply the law to the conclusion and validity of the arbitration agreement. Because the provisions of an international commercial arbitration agreement are often in the form of a single clause in an international commercial contract, and in these contracts only the applicable provisions of the law on a substantive issue are often agreed upon, No agreement has been made on the application of the law to commercial arbitration agreement, which has caused many problems. This paper discusses the two separately, and discusses how to apply the law to the unagreed commercial arbitration agreement. Chapter 6 introduces the independence theory of international commercial arbitration, starting from the origin of the theory, introduces the foundation of the theory, various theories and disputes in practice. Finally, the establishment and application of the independence theory of arbitration agreement in China are analyzed. The last chapter summarizes the legislation and practice of China's international commercial arbitration agreement, points out the existing deficiencies, and puts forward some suggestions.
【学位授予单位】:大连海事大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D997.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杜新丽;论外国仲裁裁决在我国的承认与执行——兼论《纽约公约》在中国的适用[J];比较法研究;2005年04期
2 朱巍;公共政策保留与国际商事仲裁裁决的承认和执行[J];北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版);2005年03期
3 张宾;;对国际体育仲裁院仲裁裁决承认与执行问题的思考[J];北京体育大学学报;2007年04期
4 李彩霞;;网上仲裁地法律问题研究[J];北京仲裁;2005年01期
5 宋艳丽;;论仲裁中的调解[J];北京仲裁;2005年01期
6 杨良宜;;关于可仲裁性(一)[J];北京仲裁;2005年03期
7 赵秀文;;浅谈我国仲裁裁决的分类[J];北京仲裁;2005年04期
8 周佳;;1958年《纽约公约》第一条述评——兼论我国仲裁法律体系下的国际商事仲裁裁决的国籍[J];北京仲裁;2005年04期
9 陈立峰;王海量;;论我国《仲裁法》的管辖范围[J];北京仲裁;2006年01期
10 李梦园;宋连斌;;论社会公共利益与商事仲裁的司法监督——对我国法院若干司法实践的分析[J];北京仲裁;2006年01期
相关博士学位论文 前5条
1 周清华;国际商事仲裁自裁管辖原则消极效力研究[D];大连海事大学;2010年
2 孙得胜;国际商事仲裁协议的效力问题研究[D];大连海事大学;2012年
3 赵宁;国际商事仲裁裁决撤销制度研究[D];复旦大学;2008年
4 齐湘泉;外国仲裁裁决承认及执行若干法律问题研究[D];中国政法大学;2008年
5 刘凤泉;现代商事促裁制度研究[D];东北师范大学;2009年
,本文编号:2017440
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2017440.html