欧洲的国家豁免立法与实践——兼及对中国相关立场与实践的反思

发布时间：2018-06-15 00:33

本文选题：国家豁免 + 绝对豁免论　；参考：《欧洲研究》2011年05期

【摘要】：近代国际法的发展以欧洲大陆为中心展开,最早有关国家豁免的实践来自欧洲,国家豁免的两大理论发展———绝对豁免论和限制豁免论也先后起源于欧洲。二战后至今,尽管英国、法国、德国为代表的欧洲国家有关国家豁免的立法和实践尚未统一,但《欧洲国家豁免公约》、《联合国国家及其财产管辖公约》以及欧洲人权法院的实践为各成员国规则和实践的统一提供了规则基础和方法论。欧洲大陆正在形成一种区域性的国家豁免政策。中国作为参与世界经济交往的重要国家,不能脱离于上述理论与实践发展之外。绝对坚持绝对豁免论不利于中国国家利益和国家财产的保护,可在理论上适当采纳限制豁免论,实践中发展国家豁免例外的规则。
[Abstract]:The development of modern international law centered on the European continent. The earliest practice of state immunity came from Europe. The two major theoretical developments of state immunity, absolute immunity and restricted immunity, also originated in Europe. Since the end of World War II, although the legislation and practice of the European countries represented by Britain, France and Germany on state immunity have not yet been unified. However, the European Convention on State immunity, the United Nations Convention on jurisdiction of States and their property and the practice of the European Court of Human Rights provide the basis and methodology for the unification of the rules and practices of member States. A regional policy of state immunity is emerging on the European continent. As an important country participating in the world economic exchanges, China cannot be separated from the above theoretical and practical development. Absolute adherence to the absolute immunity theory is not conducive to the protection of China's national interests and property, so the theory of restricted immunity can be adopted properly in theory and the rule of exception of state immunity can be developed in practice.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学国际法学院;
【基金】：作者主持的2011年度国家社会科学基金项目《国际商事仲裁中的国家豁免问题研究》(项目批准号:11CFX075)的阶段性成果 “上海市教育委员会重点学科建设项目资助(国际法学)J51103”的成果之一
【分类号】：D99

【参考文献】